Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 02 November 2019 05:08 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6SyD=SE=z=Rvsp11orymu1=DMfvYe3X-xmwdCV8_3ygdJA@mail.gmail.com> <a1be63d2-67c7-4efe-a0b6-5e18531c0cce@www.fastmail.com> <CAChr6SyZoasUYt0BUryppAwHz7JS0ncSGZP-iY-zQTGQAZLLzw@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw+SDCUd_FDPG-z-Lg=T3ZH3YgjBjMzB8A1W3mJsSk2zg@mail.gmail.com> <9E634E81-48C5-4EDA-B98E-972A7CACF641@akamai.com> <CAChr6Sz1pz2JpamQupBDsdTb4ArNJOfVAtZs9BypCnWbaSYEPg@mail.gmail.com> <200DEDAC-A18D-45B4-BC0F-69D8970CED47@akamai.com> <CAChr6Sx7k_WGvkWG-mk-kfV1hwYjUUKb6Rf3sCfihRtD5MO4QA@mail.gmail.com> <1c10b7bd-8580-0ff6-8e3e-0c4e2c48518e@joelhalpern.com> <3dbbafe7-43b9-191e-4cc8-ce192c016627@gmail.com> <CAChr6SzrRfLwia6cYix_8ub5H152gorXP-6ivguyT8d99_pZ-g@mail.gmail.com> <ef7afa06-ebe1-87ca-8cf8-014071ef0ff8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ef7afa06-ebe1-87ca-8cf8-014071ef0ff8@gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 22:07:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Szk8itcq3Ysd5VFYiNX4TaMSWhyiVZzCPEw6vmv+ig8Aw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "ietf-and-github@ietf.org" <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005355b3059656119f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/nBjno31DoZGe8WGXNoYczrbbTrc>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues
Precedence: list

On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 9:51 PM Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> > That is interesting. Has anything ever been overturned on appeal?
>
> For GitHub usage, I have no idea. In general:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026#section-6.5
> https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/appeals/
> Appeals can be dealt with between the appellant, the WG Chairs, and the AD,
> without invoking the formal process, and those go uncounted.


Right,

I was wondering if anything had ever been overturned on appeal using this
process.

thanks,
Rob





>
> Regards
>    Brian
>
> On 02-Nov-19 15:42, Rob Sayre wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:22 PM Brian E Carpenter <
> brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 02-Nov-19 14:41, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> >     > Looking at the draft, I think something that would address the
> issue Rob
> >     > is raising is that the first paragraph of 4.1.2 (about closing
> issues)
> >     > get an extra sentence.  Along the lines of:
> >     >      As noted in section 2.2, this guidance MUST be communicated
> to and
> >     > agreed by the working groups.
> >
> >     Agreed.
> >
> >     > One can argue that this is implicit in the document.  It seems
> like it
> >     > could help clarity and can't hurt.
> >
> >     It's already clear in the document that normal IETF process rules
> >     apply, i.e. RFC2418 etc. That certainly implies quite a lot,
> including
> >     of course that contested decisions are appealable.
> >
> >
> > That is interesting. Has anything ever been overturned on appeal?
> >
> > It would be good to record such an occurrence in future documents.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Rob
> >
>
>

[Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Rob Sayre
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Christopher Wood
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Rob Sayre
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Rob Sayre
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Salz, Rich
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Salz, Rich
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Rob Sayre
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Salz, Rich
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Rob Sayre
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Joel M. Halpern
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Brian E Carpenter
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Rob Sayre
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Brian E Carpenter
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Rob Sayre
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Brian E Carpenter
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Martin Thomson
Re: [Ietf-and-github] Closing issues Mike Bishop