RFC 3866 on Language Tags and Ranges in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        RFC 3866

        Title:      Language Tags and Ranges in the
                    Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)
        Author(s):  K. Zeilenga, Ed.
        Status:     Standards Track
        Date:       July 2004
        Mailbox:    Kurt@OpenLDAP.org
        Pages:      15
        Characters: 31501
        Obsoletes:  2596

        I-D Tag:    draft-zeilenga-ldap-rfc2596-05.txt

        URL:        ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3866.txt

It is often desirable to be able to indicate the natural language
associated with values held in a directory and to be able to query the
directory for values which fulfill the user's language needs.  This
document details the use of Language Tags and Ranges in the
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP).

This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for
the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the
"Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution
of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG.  Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.

Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body 
help: ways_to_get_rfcs.  For example:

        To: rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG
        Subject: getting rfcs

        help: ways_to_get_rfcs

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.echo 
Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.  Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.

Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza
USC/Information Sciences Institute

...

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader 
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version
of the RFCs.