IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-dkim] RFC 8463: DNS textual form underspecified

Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu> Sun, 14 April 2024 01:30 UTC

Return-Path: <steffen@sdaoden.eu>
X-Original-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C660AC14F61B for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 18:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sdaoden.eu header.b="T2T212h9"; dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=sdaoden.eu header.b="m4G6CASv"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TFaVZdeqD3FD for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 18:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sdaoden.eu (sdaoden.eu [217.144.132.164]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2183C14F61A for <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 18:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sdaoden.eu; s=citron; t=1713058237; x=1713724903; h=date:author:from:to:subject: message-id:in-reply-to:references:mail-followup-to:openpgp:blahblahblah: author:from:subject:date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to: resent-cc:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:mail-followup-to:openpgp: blahblahblah; bh=5tDMIUqoUG+7xf9OBis0J5brCxiM+IHszYtg3fuGIYw=; b=T2T212h9FjprRIk3nr3IxmVaHNIxeQxjdLb3OpMokLhdRCzlUhNCZB23sBTSwzmqzIYYJ64Y n4HiKVsn4Ap9ckaRSFGPn7UdWf8BLaQGLRrSR4vguaBtqZ5uJtmwdkm/kGBhHudEkkrHQBQvj7 sa8Uew2CYzXADCGhtJS14RdCcxhc+fpTugmlI7VXWZkXFQ+irk+fEwZKEI+mWYhkAwAl0b7fST QDO8ujxoAmu42V8GW1g/nUpVJuGVEXhB/N4VTbnW1B6rqZBsNvUb/T/k69HtOnYmuO0c5kUwOw X/KyNfNoG62TmNHzgaR1BLJqm26JHzUpSQO1QHGIPXFUZtNw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sdaoden.eu; s=orange; t=1713058237; x=1713724903; h=date:author:from:to:subject: message-id:in-reply-to:references:mail-followup-to:openpgp:blahblahblah: author:from:subject:date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to: resent-cc:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:mail-followup-to:openpgp: blahblahblah; bh=5tDMIUqoUG+7xf9OBis0J5brCxiM+IHszYtg3fuGIYw=; b=m4G6CASvU8zhVZQV7Cf/FB2JC0WgsNLzuHZE+0jdqBVZKSgXQrKyN+YsGF7ixTkxLB3NMPI9 OVXGEyetHp29Dw==
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 03:30:34 +0200
Author: Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu>
From: Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu>
To: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20240414013034.4OeC9xXk@steffen%sdaoden.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20240414010739.D752F8861FCA@ary.qy>
References: <20240414010739.D752F8861FCA@ary.qy>
Mail-Followup-To: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.24-612-g7e3bfac540
OpenPGP: id=EE19E1C1F2F7054F8D3954D8308964B51883A0DD; url=https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/steffen.asc; preference=signencrypt
BlahBlahBlah: Any stupid boy can crush a beetle. But all the professors in the world can make no bugs.
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/LOzczkfs3D5otMx7dLtxbm6JcpU>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] RFC 8463: DNS textual form underspecified
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM List <ietf-dkim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 01:30:45 -0000

John Levine wrote in
 <20240414010739.D752F8861FCA@ary.qy>:
 |It appears that Steffen Nurpmeso  <steffen@sdaoden.eu> said:
 |>|I realize that RFC 8463 says repeatedly that the base64-encoded
 |>|representation of an ED25519 key is 44 bytes, and that the
 |>|examples go for this.  Still there is no wording that the entire
 |>|ASN.1 structure shall be thrown away.
 |
 |Yeah, I should have been clearer.
 |
 |>That cannot be the reason Google, Microsoft and more do not
 |>support that, right.  It is a bit bizarre that these huge RSA keys
 |>are used all over the place, whereas the even stripped-naked ones
 |>are not.
 |
 |It's the same reason as the last umpteen times you asked.

I am the wire and Google is the Bird.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email