Re: [ietf-dkim] versions of RFC822 mail messages, Where is the formal definition of DKIM-Signature?

[Michael Thomas <[e-mail]>]

On 02/11/2018 06:20 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 2/11/2018 5:54 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>> You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
>> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>
>
>
> Mike,
>
> Please review the participation rules applicable to this list. They 
> are the same as you had so much trouble with, previously.
>
> Then please consider unsubscribing, since restraint within the bounds 
> of professional behavior appears to (continue to) be absent from your 
> repertoire.
>
> d/
>

Sorry, you don't know what you are talking about. I wrote code every day 
for a living. I wrote the first implementation of DKIM, followed
very quickly by Murray's. I know what I'm talking about here. You 
don't.  When is the last time you've written code? This is all very silly
to me, and your impugning my 30+ years of experience is a joke.

Mike

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html