Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailsploit

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Tue, 05 December 2017 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C104012869B for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:41:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bbiw.net header.b=Q7Kduys0; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=bbiw.net header.b=Pe13bKHo
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kPhtDOm5bgn6 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 436AB126B72 for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id vB5LaTga010503; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:36:29 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bbiw.net; s=default; t=1512509791; bh=7UsbJLc6wxS8zKSROdxRkHLarq/ISDGFdsJTVJVE0MM=; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=Q7Kduys0R5KvsQMNBCFKg8DxoHswBV0/y4mdVN5SMwzD69ratP+HTyZPdiAcdmDFj 8RuFJL5mLnKH29YhDRNecNgYYEmizfeIoWQc+0YaORxOmfrEh0ZNYsHk5MN8IADNa3 coYJ83dtGcrzaWVCeyrye8EqUSh6q2YFIVB+r3u4=
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id vB5LaRsG010460 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:36:27 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bbiw.net; s=default; t=1512509787; bh=TUxlLskvKpU7pYUz1aafGDuwuRWhQsuUmClqSffmZHE=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Pe13bKHoENqu5ItDIzvxJfpNE7Xr6ulJFLIg7iUrc6+yGRYE8mwzhKBHD/rdRTu/D jiUcuEOtEVUz2cJiD7vI2g0tY2YZ/lpeAFPBpMJ2CVQfeYZp+Ahfu4wddS4UKXJH7i zIZvRCAFNwDNeLa4JMM3cT4kCAYKBJVrrssfxv2c=
To: Steve Atkins <steve@wordtothewise.com>
References: <CAHNGrjEzrmdbjhxf_W2qkX8eiSoSaoYoiMDma3yuM2brS6KVmw@mail.gmail.com> <C0EC2083-D802-4D8A-B9ED-E40C7B4A97FB@wordtothewise.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <ff8e0c73-3351-5258-b903-759f73661bf8@bbiw.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 13:36:02 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C0EC2083-D802-4D8A-B9ED-E40C7B4A97FB@wordtothewise.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailsploit
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Sender: ietf-dkim <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>

On 12/5/2017 1:33 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
> It's a DMARC issue rather than a DKIM one.


How is it a DMARC issue?

d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html