IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ietf-dkim] Intended status (was: Re: [dmarc-ietf] a slightly less kludge alternative to draft-kucherawy-dmarc-rcpts)

"Rolf E. Sonneveld" <R.E.Sonneveld@sonnection.nl> Thu, 17 November 2016 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF24E12940C for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 08:13:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.791
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=sonnection.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZBarKYxACdwq for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 08:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EC2B129509 for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 08:13:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id uAHGCiPw025340; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 08:12:45 -0800
Authentication-Results: simon.songbird.com; dkim=fail reason="verification failed; unprotected key" header.d=sonnection.nl header.i=@sonnection.nl header.b=Ojw/elhY; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy); dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from mx10.mailtransaction.com (mx10.mailtransaction.com [88.198.59.241]) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id uAHGCfcG025336 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 08:12:42 -0800
Received: from mx14.mailtransaction.com (mx11.mailtransaction.com [88.198.59.230]) by mx10.mailtransaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3tKR2l48Dpz5Mgw9; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:11:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from tiger.sonnection.nl (D57E1706.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [213.126.23.6]) by mx14.mailtransaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3tKR2l2yJhz5Mgw8; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:11:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiger.sonnection.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B01042192B; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:11:43 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tiger.sonnection.nl
Received: from tiger.sonnection.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tiger.sonnection.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id KNTvFXdfI1aM; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:11:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.40.49] (unknown [192.168.40.49]) by tiger.sonnection.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F6714210C5; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:11:43 +0100 (CET)
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1611142158000.21738@ary.local> <01Q7ASDZFS6C011WUX@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAL0qLwazAg2UJvGAr+nx8R_xEbc4xV0ttPEWFKUD69u6xXaMhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwaMzy=qeW5XYZ_txPaiYE27Oof+C5V1uRANvv-_cayOcQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Rolf E. Sonneveld" <R.E.Sonneveld@sonnection.nl>
Organization: Sonnection B.V.
Message-ID: <234f6b74-cd9a-af64-c7b6-da06a9d76cc5@sonnection.nl>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:11:42 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwaMzy=qeW5XYZ_txPaiYE27Oof+C5V1uRANvv-_cayOcQ@mail.gmail.com>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sonnection.nl; s=2009; t=1479399103; bh=TKFdkHj0RRnV0LGnuJoH1/l4bZ5nMbqRAvgAp1n9Kt8=; h=Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:From; b=Ojw/elhYgKPCsuJ52ErT+riwWOlhfhmK6KpQKbBJMOvzP2IZoZgHHjFxCK6dqXjZB MNlcFqrGhuKCmYS9LxZqHLFLrhrlOWIYRZrAdE1ciS1IQsbI0bcKBA96nD+EJnlUPn TaeGmjqbwuIX1ViMe+TljbzENGVkxLaJKkHDWCo0=
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.2 mx10.mailtransaction.com 3tKR2l48Dpz5Mgw9
Cc: "ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org" <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Intended status (was: Re: [dmarc-ietf] a slightly less kludge alternative to draft-kucherawy-dmarc-rcpts)
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Sender: ietf-dkim <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>

Hi, Murray,

On 16-11-16 02:45, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> There's been a lot of great feedback here.  I just cranked out an 
> update based on the discussion so far:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-kucherawy-dkim-rcpts-01
>
> I forgot to update the title of Section 3, but other than that I think 
> I captured what's been discussed.  Please let me know what I've missed.

the intended status field is empty, but do you have some intended status 
in mind or not yet?

/rolf

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email