Re: [Ietf-hub-bangalore] IP hop by hop routing with TE

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 07 May 2016 04:54 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-hub-bangalore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-hub-bangalore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5458B12D1B4 for <ietf-hub-bangalore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2016 21:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6s9QyTE5zBxq for <ietf-hub-bangalore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2016 21:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22a.google.com (mail-io0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F174B12D183 for <ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 May 2016 21:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id d62so131945601iof.2 for <ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 May 2016 21:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=NDSXu9CFRc5lnzdPHsRvdgL93F1awr5LkHde+ZqPIcs=; b=n8uNJGaAE9p8fOT5neCba25GkSAzPQtyGW9zz7F12rtT9So1JUNO9ksgVDho98QRwt JcQZ6YfUM9qdeucVDSbSerbi+Xsn+1ALbSuAs0tdnZpeR01IXikmQ4m2xELEsp3cVSIW lyGeSonnONfoUIBAniuh5Nk2ea1aSK4EsZ1F5zy8brUsZi7kUhY2H+8xTbTFeQwGdvcD ClbCApxr0Vg4t988PSgYz7gqGbAwfBlSEjJ40BKmNTi+XiCYPPk/Sy7ppEnhn/2pE75i 8bGWi9vgxWPHnjh3vNBKmHNCbAn+dGXTJHBVN4a7BOUlzq9ryFZXv28bXzoa3uB5xKRa 2ilA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=NDSXu9CFRc5lnzdPHsRvdgL93F1awr5LkHde+ZqPIcs=; b=gb+jXl/H6A2P/Wr3UHaX236L36g+22u6e+4S/iSzOr4ltvWq1jyFWTd4Z+zpyPzv9x Uao1MkCs294mGD4jDFUVEqiPyRcvSn25d86lG3uxIXSaBxGkog/ZZ9TcGYL5O3Dcvo3x BNFkREnN7ZpjGzmpbCyJ4zQdbWKr8nzxMgwMH0hY8CUbT1oUMT0K6d6O1wMYyhwlEUBf 2DNzWhwpT3avdtbO2YVrrCWXPGFiUh3TFTHc6+tOiemkQ8eEENvpPOR/7QGhRgYgKbwA kfnTL+TyaobWbAXbwIMnQAaiVEYnExUPLBGharNoF2HRoAKcHpBGy4vUNAZyPd3WDoXl 1jJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUMkj2Wawk3C/Gw3MRtLPKc5mf+EcE270WBw7L8CkVkw3dBuBmdDMH+g7uMsQnEzOpFzaVA8sNYbBgoZg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.15.150 with SMTP id 22mr27619770iop.155.1462596854192; Fri, 06 May 2016 21:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
Received: by 10.50.39.2 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2016 21:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMF3MVu4Ted08PD_W3+ko3mwGn-q6bE30Rof5hHW4QK_DMGPcQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMF3MVt4j8xkd1R+fJ-96_U80S5SvkmcUqfcjJt0Ah1==FrYHA@mail.gmail.com> <CAB75xn7+JThcPpYdho3zpSj5fET8fc7aj9f6zC+oi_tmJKsRLg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMF3MVsOhLaZ3aFAcy9-iC7fS3FNW3_=Dh+YR0Mx9H=VcjHTOA@mail.gmail.com> <CAB75xn54Zd93dKrHr5hPKqx-+HWiO-P3VAUVbQs52oa6=_a8XQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMF3MVu4Ted08PD_W3+ko3mwGn-q6bE30Rof5hHW4QK_DMGPcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 10:24:14 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: aUpfOxXdrp-VB6mJOYD1CrqgKCI
Message-ID: <CAB75xn6MxJfP=fXc94gUKB3zoM=US2SeO5Gq_6CW=OP9W566YQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
To: sujay gupta <sujay.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113eec9af1a3720532395d85"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-hub-bangalore/KdB6iOcCPzSfZPIAGKKW4p-_50w>
Cc: ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org, "dhruv.dhody@huawei.com" <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-hub-bangalore] IP hop by hop routing with TE
X-BeenThere: ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For IETFers in Bangalore, India" <ietf-hub-bangalore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-hub-bangalore>, <mailto:ietf-hub-bangalore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-hub-bangalore/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-hub-bangalore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-hub-bangalore>, <mailto:ietf-hub-bangalore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 04:54:18 -0000

Hi Sujay,

Currently we are working on ONOS G release to have CSPF and PCE built in.
But you do need to figure out which southbound to use? Can OF carry Ipv6-SR
header?

Regards,
Dhruv


On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 4:16 AM, sujay gupta <sujay.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Dhruv,
>
> Good idea on using SR, but which PCE controller has inbuilt application
> for constraint based routing?
>
> Regards.
> -Sujay
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sujay,
>>
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:56 PM, sujay gupta <sujay.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> HI Dhruv
>>>
>>> Thanks for the link it is a good introduction and relevant details on
>>> the TE.
>>>
>>> So when you say PCE works currently with MPLS, I would typically need a
>>> controller (PCEP controller) with a TE database and BGP-LS
>>> for feeding the information, right?
>>>
>>
>> ​Yes!
>> ​
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Which comes to the next question after PCEP controller has the TED, is
>>> running a CSPF path a part of the PCEP role, or an application has to be
>>> build over it?
>>>
>>
>> ​Both option exist. For in case of ODL, the application decides the path,
>> in some controller the path computation algorithm is built in. ​
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> My use case is a single IGP domain requiring light-weight TE.
>>>
>>> Hence my choice would be a constraint based source routing mechanism.
>>> The intelligence for which can be calculated using OSPF-TE or ISIS-TE, but
>>> the question
>>> remains is how do set up the transport path without MPLS.
>>>
>>
>> The protocol "PCEP" might not help you, but what if after computing the
>> path you use openflow to set the "flow" (in MPLS we would call that LSP) on
>> each node.
>>
>> Another option would be SR with IPv6 in data plane.
>>
>> ​and then there is this -
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-pcr-05 and
>> http://www.ieee802.org/1/pages/802.1ca.html
>>
>> Hope this helps!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dhruv​
>>
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -Sujay
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Sujay,
>>>>
>>>> PCE *currently* works well with MPLS (RSVP-TE signaling or Segement
>>>> Routing without signalling).
>>>>
>>>> If no MPLS, checkout https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3272/ which
>>>> might give you some ideas.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Dhruv
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:37 AM, sujay gupta <sujay.ietf@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Group
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am trying to do a hop by hop IP routing with guaranteed/reserved
>>>>> bandwidth for a certain traffic class.
>>>>>
>>>>> The decision should be dynamic, so i will need some IGP or EGP TE
>>>>> extension.
>>>>>
>>>>> So how can I do this with a central controller? (PCE??)
>>>>> And can I do this without a central controller ( equivalent to
>>>>> MPLS;RSVP -TE but without MPLS)
>>>>>
>>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> -Sujay
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ietf-hub-bangalore mailing list
>>>>> Ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-hub-bangalore
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>