Re: [Ietf-hub-bangalore] IP hop by hop routing with TE

sujay gupta <sujay.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 06 May 2016 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <sujay.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-hub-bangalore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-hub-bangalore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B955B12D177 for <ietf-hub-bangalore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2016 15:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tjhxqnXTv3ep for <ietf-hub-bangalore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2016 15:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35FBD12D14A for <ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 May 2016 15:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x235.google.com with SMTP id s8so52569123ign.0 for <ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 May 2016 15:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=aoxCHpPo6giNwgt+0xxBfesCrtzIgTM0xDnk2iKAXiY=; b=daCoeOMyrFueYIKFR7/1Aj/+KB7Z86DnWqyIwvM2kE/OL1aPoy0UpIbxDeilPkN7yl 1pcIWFEb4yr3Fyn0W+/X9yGGh3zUf+LvRyqqPTXoMZkur6frHZQa9WvGmvy6B8fW5sFj SVnsKNZNXuFEL3h5nkgt4I/JoFppU2Q9GzcK57qm+/QwprXBhcHcRZKqHFDg0nvRNZEM GaZ6BiyjAPrAkCnICbx8RBObWXn8hF4BNbcLgo2G+H5oG6A6XEIOWqFsnOkVUIsqhj7U SYJppwOxxe8Lwda3lcg2AzPzIZ/9cBt7AAeYETBMeZtenpVTJhBpcDMSB9mThvN/IoRg wLOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=aoxCHpPo6giNwgt+0xxBfesCrtzIgTM0xDnk2iKAXiY=; b=kOJTcQXje+kZq61LXsYQwQ6+JUCfLuw+uNfiGTERBxs8s8MDXCTZ9pwFZi8kOheRss OQ4BEZSAml5mOeD5r1iYvnlckvLbp8tk6EVbZCzU2EB3S6UNHKbfvlA23BGn9setICuE Q781qzsdVxU6wwrTQQW2+1EWou0nMujLOBDpi05Q2XnXcfYF8b1NwOe1f6VQkLg/vvf1 w7Ro9FSPBQP9XOPZimC3ZMlJ6y/1NRO3dQPCj2s/1ulUaG49j4stv6mmf4qRLOy7PtJc u8nUF0GhZmZ+K1Bd1ufz1lnaTCKkwwwVblo7plYpXpq2qeHBaX+AGSlQgibk2aocsB1m hdvw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWzGBTT+pT0Zi2TLW/n4cDArSjtwpm4IlRCmrglDDAoHD+BvPDs9grLoXeaEXjmWH+Lqr4xfWkCnDjMiw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.29.39 with SMTP id g7mr80323igh.50.1462574771576; Fri, 06 May 2016 15:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.225.225 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2016 15:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn54Zd93dKrHr5hPKqx-+HWiO-P3VAUVbQs52oa6=_a8XQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMF3MVt4j8xkd1R+fJ-96_U80S5SvkmcUqfcjJt0Ah1==FrYHA@mail.gmail.com> <CAB75xn7+JThcPpYdho3zpSj5fET8fc7aj9f6zC+oi_tmJKsRLg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMF3MVsOhLaZ3aFAcy9-iC7fS3FNW3_=Dh+YR0Mx9H=VcjHTOA@mail.gmail.com> <CAB75xn54Zd93dKrHr5hPKqx-+HWiO-P3VAUVbQs52oa6=_a8XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 15:46:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMF3MVu4Ted08PD_W3+ko3mwGn-q6bE30Rof5hHW4QK_DMGPcQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: sujay gupta <sujay.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd758ccb7a95b053234399e
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-hub-bangalore/abvMoJWmwrsROhSOWxflH0WsoGg>
Cc: ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org, "dhruv.dhody@huawei.com" <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-hub-bangalore] IP hop by hop routing with TE
X-BeenThere: ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For IETFers in Bangalore, India" <ietf-hub-bangalore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-hub-bangalore>, <mailto:ietf-hub-bangalore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-hub-bangalore/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-hub-bangalore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-hub-bangalore>, <mailto:ietf-hub-bangalore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 22:46:15 -0000

Hi Dhruv,

Good idea on using SR, but which PCE controller has inbuilt application for
constraint based routing?

Regards.
-Sujay



On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Hi Sujay,
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:56 PM, sujay gupta <sujay.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:
>
>> HI Dhruv
>>
>> Thanks for the link it is a good introduction and relevant details on the
>> TE.
>>
>> So when you say PCE works currently with MPLS, I would typically need a
>> controller (PCEP controller) with a TE database and BGP-LS
>> for feeding the information, right?
>>
>
> ​Yes!
> ​
>
>
>>
>> Which comes to the next question after PCEP controller has the TED, is
>> running a CSPF path a part of the PCEP role, or an application has to be
>> build over it?
>>
>
> ​Both option exist. For in case of ODL, the application decides the path,
> in some controller the path computation algorithm is built in. ​
>
>
>
>>
>> My use case is a single IGP domain requiring light-weight TE.
>>
>> Hence my choice would be a constraint based source routing mechanism. The
>> intelligence for which can be calculated using OSPF-TE or ISIS-TE, but the
>> question
>> remains is how do set up the transport path without MPLS.
>>
>
> The protocol "PCEP" might not help you, but what if after computing the
> path you use openflow to set the "flow" (in MPLS we would call that LSP) on
> each node.
>
> Another option would be SR with IPv6 in data plane.
>
> ​and then there is this -
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-pcr-05 and
> http://www.ieee802.org/1/pages/802.1ca.html
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> Regards,
> Dhruv​
>
>
>
>> Regards,
>> -Sujay
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sujay,
>>>
>>> PCE *currently* works well with MPLS (RSVP-TE signaling or Segement
>>> Routing without signalling).
>>>
>>> If no MPLS, checkout https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3272/ which
>>> might give you some ideas.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dhruv
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:37 AM, sujay gupta <sujay.ietf@gmail.com>;
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Group
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to do a hop by hop IP routing with guaranteed/reserved
>>>> bandwidth for a certain traffic class.
>>>>
>>>> The decision should be dynamic, so i will need some IGP or EGP TE
>>>> extension.
>>>>
>>>> So how can I do this with a central controller? (PCE??)
>>>> And can I do this without a central controller ( equivalent to
>>>> MPLS;RSVP -TE but without MPLS)
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> -Sujay
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ietf-hub-bangalore mailing list
>>>> Ietf-hub-bangalore@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-hub-bangalore
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>