IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-nomcom] BCP 10 Update, adding an IAOC Advisor to the Nominating Committee

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 09 August 2017 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5797D1323CB for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 09:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=opendkim.org header.b=WqqbyR3t; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=elandsys.com header.b=TG+KRzP8
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ZH3GpAYdY5w for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 09:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA1E1323A6 for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 09:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.226.53.59]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v79G3ouS014306 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Aug 2017 09:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1502294641; x=1502381041; bh=VS2QYmoZTB0T3ZiMQrJ6xzCivKxkaAIpulx+MQ2yH5I=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=WqqbyR3t5Ry+D9s+AwlyfvMgSHs903IjFQWp6YqFnadm1USqZ2RJq9M3j2I1QiwY+ +9JtT1pMHrJ8vfGOc5L1/EGFvwsSHLz8vsQtpCfScOYWYgpxAEOOJb+kkTFgiuZwDI zHuXmvNaWBRbFhWdMD/UEAigvfgVHhbSJk5ZFEdY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1502294641; x=1502381041; i=@elandsys.com; bh=VS2QYmoZTB0T3ZiMQrJ6xzCivKxkaAIpulx+MQ2yH5I=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=TG+KRzP87VjfoEuYJlB/zqg/mZZq+ArUc1lzR9qPuPTUEE+ljvA89h4MafmXLx+Mv QRNJUJGZQmgrWNUHunjQV3lveiyjFqicLzMkJlMbwMdmyBuBz1xSWevXiCJXtWd6Fr m3LOYmfF61BMqfcRQ4HIk8abVRaXM31gLj5axmsQ=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20170809085713.0df50b60@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 09:03:34 -0700
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-cd2-tS=3QnvRcsDKcZ8=o5Z98wUr-=tp8OeP9J1M0M8g@mail.g mail.com>
References: <CAKKJt-cd2-tS=3QnvRcsDKcZ8=o5Z98wUr-=tp8OeP9J1M0M8g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-nomcom/Al1llhNTDjCfxmUF_75Ja9eOGpU>
Subject: Re: [ietf-nomcom] BCP 10 Update, adding an IAOC Advisor to the Nominating Committee
X-BeenThere: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of possible revisions to the NomCom process <ietf-nomcom.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-nomcom/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 16:04:10 -0000

Hi Spencer,

[Cc trimmed]

At 19:44 08-08-2017, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
>At Alissa Cooper's request, I put together a short draft that 
>updates BCP 10, the Nomcom process, adding a reminder that Nomcoms 
>can ask the IAOC to provide an advisor, and the IAOC can provide one.

The new text in Section 6.1 says: ""may propose the addition of an 
advisor" in the first paragraph and "Committee members are encouraged 
to propose the addition of an advisor" in the second paragraph.  I 
read that as meaning that the editor is saying two slightly different things.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email