Re: [ietf-nomcom] BCP 10 Update, adding an IAOC Advisor to the Nominating Committee

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 10 August 2017 01:53 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D430C131CDF for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 18:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id glcn2IdS_NQa for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 18:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84696129B25 for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 18:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E94BDD8; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 02:53:48 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-4B18VsHpA7; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 02:53:47 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.244.2.100] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D57E7BDCC; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 02:53:46 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1502330026; bh=uXEKqDMlo3P039AmLAo5tss7g8clEfJZQzQioFbweq4=; h=Subject:Cc:References:To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=yhgLthCdlurznUZdcQPoOLJkfr3ENg97Vwuj9mJK17hrenH/lchOtLJxupCBiTkvZ K4ix9Zw4C7DIEAtv7c1N4EiLMwSyEcWsCKFJ9An8wcd2rbKDw0MNlmxao1yILEmRLR 52mfmLc3YQcwmcEcFkV/5a8RuBDbqiiwEevZAwGQ=
References: <CAKKJt-cd2-tS=3QnvRcsDKcZ8=o5Z98wUr-=tp8OeP9J1M0M8g@mail.gmail.com> <4622.1502292425@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CAKKJt-fxhFnnK3T2nVj2bD=Ve7z6L0oJFjYFqBb59TusJDwFzQ@mail.gmail.com> <1250df52-b5b3-4f71-bab1-790d156af1e9@nostrum.com> <5f26388a-93aa-7133-6973-de669a9bb2f4@gmail.com> <CAA=duU2hn-6=OzvZrfuz0agvzxvV0euXP4nsnjdksUpsnAyfJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-chkcrJRfCU1_MHb47H7GZNHafkbwVZKNsxh2pQzXyiYA@mail.gmail.com> <6e62d88a-ba0e-18eb-3a45-88851b6e7c46@joelhalpern.com> <CAKKJt-dJ2Z1wsqXveg7+PR13d2bH61pHR753gEamwqWv4f+hKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: NomCom-Discussion <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <0c83a20d-325b-d928-a157-638fcaf81adf@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 02:53:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-dJ2Z1wsqXveg7+PR13d2bH61pHR753gEamwqWv4f+hKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BMumt3HbeEKUGQXKiBdaxLBtu5f6LBVbq"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-nomcom/jDqb00MduKj9tn0ROtHGqitDFsg>
Subject: Re: [ietf-nomcom] BCP 10 Update, adding an IAOC Advisor to the Nominating Committee
X-BeenThere: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of possible revisions to the NomCom process <ietf-nomcom.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-nomcom/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 01:53:53 -0000

Hiya,

FWIW, my take:

- I don't care if we use the term liaison or advisor
- I do think the IAOC has to pick the person
- I do think every nomcom needs such a person helping
  out
- I'm fine if a recent but not current IAOC member is
  the stuckee, where recent is say <= 2 years since
  being an IAOC appointee. Weasel wording around that
  goal is fine so long as the intent is clear.
- If the stuckee is not a current IAOC member, then I
  think there needs to be some form of appeal of the
  appointment possible, even if that's via some hard
  to exercise mechanism.

S.