IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-privacy] Status?

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 06 May 2014 13:03 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2940F1A0311 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 May 2014 06:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZIuWe5ISf22L for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 May 2014 06:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8821A0318 for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 May 2014 06:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 53E8E28028E; Tue, 6 May 2014 15:03:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA3A28027C; Tue, 6 May 2014 15:03:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425D0B3800C; Tue, 6 May 2014 15:03:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 15:03:10 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
Message-ID: <20140506130309.GA582@nic.fr>
References: <5367CDC1.40200@gmx.net> <CAPv4CP_F3=PGy9ivQ3Azw+eVjYBOxLH9-hm6Gr-C+L-cfkAEtw@mail.gmail.com> <5367E6E6.3080009@acm.org> <5367EC39.6050304@acm.org> <013e01cf68e7$9f1d5ef0$dd581cd0$@huitema.net> <CAPv4CP_RPAPXetPPkV0FZSm8UFH=D7SsjCVsZgGi+OzpoMXNsQ@mail.gmail.com> <5368DB29.6070506@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5368DB29.6070506@acm.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux jessie/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/8Zd9kSa_tHGpYTL637dHkj2DXas
Cc: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] Status?
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 13:03:47 -0000

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 08:52:57AM -0400,
 Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote 
 a message of 30 lines which said:

> Discussing them on this list might be an idea.

Another reason why some tickets in
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/ppm-legacy-review/> appear to be
inactive is that because work takes place elsewhere. For instance, for
ticket #8 (DNS privacy considerations), work is on the mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email