IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-privacy] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cooper-ietf-privacy-requirements-00.txt

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sat, 21 September 2013 05:59 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9320711E80FF for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 22:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wXjWKiTciUdH for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 22:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B243F21F9A6D for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 22:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8L5v5Eb014583; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 22:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1379743031; bh=Re0EjNTpi2aSvpGeVbRHoSngy9PrvVEMPUlztlOeiFI=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=qsjmuVADVV+ByXpCCEUoMhUqdSZQR3tK/0/vhMhCVzFtPzKNzwnCVoJv9nvUzGn/b ju+XkMuCL3Yb8axSZ6aU+goBlhV76GZvts9OD/20UhVcrE0h9I/D5lNqe69IihNEyf Znp4ddfmP1N2yPot5V0XbfUDUmWjY7xARj7f+cg8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1379743031; i=@resistor.net; bh=Re0EjNTpi2aSvpGeVbRHoSngy9PrvVEMPUlztlOeiFI=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=m/zTfGQPq+kfd2jEq333zi3qLUwWc9gHkpsuq2rd1PY56frpwiNFjGQybdA+wogBH UASgPNazZsqtzPQeHhplmd0ichrDjj93PjbIU2CPyPs8ahAc26tHqDssWZH7sqtDal gGODiipirbPsX4jXNjlRt5QnXc5WNMB0kWLbjXHU=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130920224035.0b5bf338@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 22:55:25 -0700
To: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <523C7912.1060206@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <20130920162352.23295.48024.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <523C7912.1060206@cs.tcd.ie>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cooper-ietf-privacy-requirements-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 05:59:49 -0000

Hello,
At 09:34 20-09-2013, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>FYI. Comments welcome,

I read draft-cooper-ietf-privacy-requirements-00 quickly.

 From Section 3:

   "standards-track IETF protocols that involve transmission of personal data"

The above only covers sending personal data.  I commented about a 
draft previously [1].  The Gen-ART review [2] mentioned that:

   "Misuse of this specification and many others could harm privacy,
   but that shouldn't necessarily dissuade us from publishing this draft."

The SecDir review didn't consider privacy as a security concern [3].

Would draft-cooper-ietf-privacy-requirements-00 be applicable for the 
above case?

Regards,
-sm

1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg79722.html
2. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg79959.html
3. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg04083.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email