IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Concluding the SPF and Sender ID experiments

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 26 February 2009 07:20 UTC

Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n1Q7KsW8027129 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:20:54 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n1Q7Ksng027127; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:20:54 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n1Q7KrlY027120 for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:20:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from sm@resistor.net)
Received: from subman.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.4.Alpha0/8.14.4.Alpha0) with ESMTP id n1Q7KdIC009050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:20:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1235632849; x=1235719249; bh=twJoVR0fzFmt9aW4T1fvsIhx+wfjpsBcQBnj7JYkTsc=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=jMmYHRULaf5rb69Im1qxGX/w+zQ9jxvEHi/nrJvFfKfzsRVJY+LW/45K+vKRd9CA8 LWm/B7gE2Yj1WABJHfSLl5/9aNHSzS9xEd4t8Tr3nn0QH1DassWzJjDpVdPZTYRabS AoKT45tLBvri/WhpadS7zgDXcApz+iZQcRh9br7A=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=BfQdTHZ0zfa69XQhTy9cYYZ/4KxAL5g4OP6ICCStyAEfPFi6tXVNFj77sWiGY8f+q +xeN2IV667nS/R6TW5nYEeBOU7AV6vcLz8SV/uRBc+0ZBbfbKcXOK5IfEDacuLYsDFm OGE8KyFaPY5ChVFw4ffsXBb7JRTp3R8Z83P1C4Y=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20090225230155.02aeb2c0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:12:18 -0800
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@Cisco.COM>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Concluding the SPF and Sender ID experiments
Cc: ietf-smtp@imc.org
In-Reply-To: <49A63BB5.3030000@cisco.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20090225151135.02d1a2b8@elandnews.com> <49A63BB5.3030000@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

Hi Jim,
At 22:50 25-02-2009, Jim Fenton wrote:
>I gather the draft you're referring to is
>draft-moonesamy-senderid-spf-historic-00, which expired 6 months or so
>ago.  You might consider issuing a -01 if you want to keep the issue active.

The expiry date is August 19, 2009. :-)

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email