IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Concluding the SPF and Sender ID experiments

Jim Fenton <fenton@Cisco.COM> Thu, 26 February 2009 14:21 UTC

Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n1QELJhG056196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:21:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n1QELJ7P056195; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:21:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n1QEL7Jh056159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:21:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from fenton@cisco.com)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,271,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="147780134"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2009 14:21:07 +0000
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (sj-core-3.cisco.com [171.68.223.137]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n1QEL7ok005975; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:21:07 -0800
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1QEL7Ea024955; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:21:07 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:21:07 -0800
Received: from stealth-10-32-251-4.cisco.com ([10.32.251.4]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:21:06 -0800
Message-ID: <49A6A552.8010304@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:21:06 -0800
From: Jim Fenton <fenton@Cisco.COM>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
CC: ietf-smtp@imc.org
Subject: Re: Concluding the SPF and Sender ID experiments
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20090225151135.02d1a2b8@elandnews.com> <49A63BB5.3030000@cisco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20090225230155.02aeb2c0@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20090225230155.02aeb2c0@resistor.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2009 14:21:06.0805 (UTC) FILETIME=[769A0A50:01C9981D]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=524; t=1235658067; x=1236522067; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fenton@cisco.com; z=From:=20Jim=20Fenton=20<fenton@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Concluding=20the=20SPF=20and=20Sender=2 0ID=20experiments |Sender:=20; bh=JGkRYTXh7hFILAD0S8BI3Y+S2miMK/aPCZ/4xxJYQyI=; b=P+tGX2Eq4rlgsBE/HngpzhjoIEoVYr8H5gomq6SqBvJB2P8Yb7mhye6TIz L2PVXiEB+nK0kEp9ZJEC1RS2Wkwamh8swC8QL2bQROhHiNyZsunHuovxGpNB ReQWvZSeZeRxfyDInzc7lm0zOt2E9c/xFWZZR3xV1IFN+ZyYwkHt4=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=fenton@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

It does show up as expired on the Internet-Draft Database Interface.  Is
it possible that it says 2008 rather than 2009 someplace and that got
picked up by the tools?

-Jim

SM wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> At 22:50 25-02-2009, Jim Fenton wrote:
>> I gather the draft you're referring to is
>> draft-moonesamy-senderid-spf-historic-00, which expired 6 months or so
>> ago.  You might consider issuing a -01 if you want to keep the issue
>> active.
>
> The expiry date is August 19, 2009. :-)
>
> Regards,
> -sm
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email