draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement-07.txt

itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino) Thu, 23 October 2003 07:12 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9N7CEI7014810 for <ietf-smtp-bks@above.proper.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 00:12:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h9N7CDhb014808 for ietf-smtp-bks; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 00:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [219.101.47.130]) by above.proper.com (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9N7BdI7014634 for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 00:12:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org)
Received: by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EFF7C96; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:10:53 +0900 (JST)
To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
Cc: motonori@econ.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Cc: randy@psg.com
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, hardie@qualcomm.com, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@sun.com>, kre@munnari.OZ.AU
Cc: ietf-smtp@imc.org
Cc: itojun@itojun.org
Subject: draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement-07.txt
References: <E1ACReg-0000Po-8k@roam.psg.com>
X-Mailer: Cue version 0.6 (031002-0709/itojun)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="NextPart-20031023160824-1162402"
Message-Id: <20031023071053.EFF7C96@coconut.itojun.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:10:53 +0900
From: itojun@itojun.org
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

	an updated version of draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement
	is attached.

	to ADs: it may not reflect all the coments i have received, but anyways
	better than nothing.  i think it should really be integrated into
	update to RFC2821 (instead of being standalone document).
	it is still using "ngtrans" in the name, however, it is suggested that
	the document should be discussed in APP area (there's no email-related
	WG exist at this point).

itojun