IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement-07.txt

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Sun, 14 December 2003 01:15 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBE1Fpib066090 for <ietf-smtp-bks@above.proper.com>; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 17:15:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id hBE1FpKf066089 for ietf-smtp-bks; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 17:15:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from almso1.proxy.att.com (almso1.att.com [192.128.167.69]) by above.proper.com (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBE1Fnib066084 for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 17:15:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tony@att.com)
Received: from maillennium.att.com ([135.25.114.99]) by almso1.proxy.att.com (AT&T IPNS/MSO-5.0) with ESMTP id hBE1FkAT028372 for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 20:15:46 -0500
Received: from att.com (unknown[135.210.32.54](misconfigured sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with SMTP id <20031214011309gw1005alu6e> (Authid: tony); Sun, 14 Dec 2003 01:13:09 +0000
Message-ID: <3FDBBA0D.2030401@att.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 20:17:01 -0500
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-smtp@imc.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement-07.txt
References: <20031023071053.EFF7C96@coconut.itojun.org> <20031211034713.AD33B94@coconut.itojun.org> <AFF2218A-2D68-11D8-97F7-000393DB5366@cs.utk.edu>
In-Reply-To: <AFF2218A-2D68-11D8-97F7-000393DB5366@cs.utk.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

I agree completely -- get it out there as its own RFC. Anything appropriate for 
2821bis can be added whenever that draft starts circulating.

	Tony Hansen
	tony@att.com

Keith Moore wrote:
> Personal opinion: I believe the document will have more impact if 
> published separately from the revision to RFC 2821.  I also believe that 
> tying this to the revision of RFC 2821 would significantly delay a 
> published specification for how to use SMTP in the IPv6 world.
> 
> On Dec 10, 2003, at 10:47 PM, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
>>>     an updated version of draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement
>>>     is attached.
>>>
>>>     to ADs: it may not reflect all the coments i have received, but 
>>> anyways
>>>     better than nothing.  i think it should really be integrated into
>>>     update to RFC2821 (instead of being standalone document).
>>>     it is still using "ngtrans" in the name, however, it is suggested 
>>> that
>>>     the document should be discussed in APP area (there's no 
>>> email-related
>>>     WG exist at this point).
>>
>>     ADs: let me know how to proceed on this document.  should we propose
>>     changes to RFC2821, or?  tnx.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email