FWD: ID Tracker State Update Notice: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
John C Klensin <john+smtp@jck.com> Tue, 22 July 2008 21:39 UTC
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6MLdjav011035 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:39:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id m6MLdjZH011034; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:39:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6MLdhF8011026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:39:44 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from john+smtp@jck.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=p3.JCK.COM) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1KLPaA-000HSU-Ro for ietf-smtp@imc.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:39:43 -0400
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:39:42 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john+smtp@jck.com>
To: ietf-smtp@imc.org
Subject: FWD: ID Tracker State Update Notice: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
Message-ID: <444D6D7FD65B307CE76B1AAC@p3.JCK.COM>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Hi.
To give others a chance to celebrate even before getting to
Dublin, the message below just popped into my mailbox.
My understanding is that this approval is with the changes
proposed in the note I circulated to this list last Thursday
and without any additional IESG notes.
I will consult with the RFC Editor and Lisa next week as to
whether it is worth posting -12 with those changes included or
whether the next document you see will be the published RFC
form. If anyone has any strong opinions on that subject,
please let me know (probably offlist).
Thanks to everyone, especially Tony and Lisa, for moving this
through the long ordeal and to the IESG for getting the document
unstuck and accepting what I believe is a completely reasonable
solution to the perceived textual problems.
john
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Date: Tuesday, 22 July, 2008 11:13 -0700
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: klensin@jck.com, tony@att.com, chris.newman@sun.com
Subject: ID Tracker State Update Notice: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
'State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG
Evaluation::AD Followup by Lisa Dusseault' ID Tracker URL:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_
id&dTag=13354&rfc_flag=0
---------- End Forwarded Message ----------
- FWD: ID Tracker State Update Notice: draft-klensi… John C Klensin