IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Approved (was: Unsticking rfc2821bis)

John C Klensin <john@jck.com> Tue, 22 July 2008 22:12 UTC

Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6MMC43C012614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:12:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id m6MMC4nX012613; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:12:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6MMC2MM012607 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:12:03 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from john@jck.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=p3.JCK.COM) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1KLQ5R-000IVn-Ew; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:12:01 -0400
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:12:00 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john@jck.com>
To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>, ietf-smtp@imc.org
Subject: Re: Approved (was: Unsticking rfc2821bis)
Message-ID: <1B65F20C559243112C01F8CE@p3.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <g65i2r$8u1$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <6321303D277CE127C90AF9D0@p3.JCK.COM> <g65i2r$8u1$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

--On Tuesday, 22 July, 2008 23:05 +0200 Frank Ellermann
<nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> wrote:

> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-klensin-rfc2821bi
> s/comment/84439/?
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/ballot/2471/
> 
> That was it.  I don't recall interminable 2821bis
> discussions on the *rfc822* list, but 2821bis was
> certainly discussed on various lists.

It looks like the 2822upd announcement and the 2821bis one got
tangled.  Lisa was clearly the responsible AD for 2821bis, not
Chris, the mailing list is wrong, and, in a perfect world, a few
other little details ought to be tuned.  But I'm happy to just
have it over.

    john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email