IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-08.txt

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com> Tue, 15 July 2003 07:19 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h6F7JZqt037471 for <ietf-smtp-bks@above.proper.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:19:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6F7JZY2037470 for ietf-smtp-bks; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from joy.songbird.com (joy.songbird.com [208.184.79.7]) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h6F7JYqt037456; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:19:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcrocker@brandenburg.com)
Received: from BBFUJIP.brandenburg.com (jay.songbird.com [208.184.79.253]) by joy.songbird.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6F7NIF08295; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:23:20 -0700
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 09:20:14 +0200
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.63 Beta/11) Personal
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <14069135902.20030715092014@brandenburg.com>
To: ietf-smtp@imc.org
CC: ietf-fax@imc.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-08.txt
In-Reply-To: <20030715.144343.01366541.tamura@toda.ricoh.co.jp>
References: <20030626.085226.01368429.tamura@toda.ricoh.co.jp> <20030715.144343.01366541.tamura@toda.ricoh.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

Folks,

HT> I asked your comments as below, but nothing.
HT> Please comment NOW if there are things to suggest/discuss about the document.
HT> If not, FAX WG will request the IESG consideration again, sooner or later.
...
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-08.txt


I would like to strongly add to Tamura-san's request.  The proposed SMTP
extension adds to a variety of other mechanisms for doing capabilities
negotiation.  This extension is to make that negotiation feasible
through email transport, and has been enhanced to include an
authorization mechanism from the sender.

Please at least do a quick review and comment to the list, to provide an
explicit, documented sanity check from the email community.

d/
--
 Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email