IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-08.txt

Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> Wed, 16 July 2003 11:24 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h6GBOHqt068031 for <ietf-smtp-bks@above.proper.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:24:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6GBOHWJ068030 for ietf-smtp-bks; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from episteme-software.com (champdsl-25-66.mcleodusa.net [216.43.25.66]) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h6GBOFqt068020; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:24:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from presnick@qualcomm.com)
Received: from [81.160.98.150] (81.160.98.150) by episteme-software.com with ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server X 3.2.2b1); Wed, 16 Jul 2003 06:24:12 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: resnick@resnick1.qualcomm.com
Message-Id: <p06001b00bb3ae5ee54a0@[81.160.98.150]>
In-Reply-To: <20030715.144343.01366541.tamura@toda.ricoh.co.jp>
References: <20030626.085226.01368429.tamura@toda.ricoh.co.jp> <20030715.144343.01366541.tamura@toda.ricoh.co.jp>
X-Mailer: Eudora [Macintosh version 6.0a25]
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:24:09 +0200
To: Hiroshi Tamura <tamura@toda.ricoh.co.jp>
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-08.txt
Cc: ietf-smtp@imc.org, ietf-fax@imc.org, dcrocker@brandenburg.com, toyoda.kiyoshi@jp.panasonic.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

On 7/15/03 at 2:43 PM +0900, Hiroshi Tamura wrote:

>I asked your comments as below, but nothing.
>Please comment NOW if there are things to suggest/discuss about the document.
>If not, FAX WG will request the IESG consideration again, sooner or later.

Why is the CONPERM command necessary? Isn't putting Content-Convert 
parts in a message implicit permission to do such transformations? Or 
is CONPERM really just signalling the server to go look inside the 
message?

Other than that, it looks like an OK document to me.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick <mailto:presnick@qualcomm.com>
QUALCOMM Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email