IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: request discussion of two documents on SMTP relaying

Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Thu, 16 June 2005 20:49 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5GKnLSV074167; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:49:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id j5GKnLm7074166; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from klutz.cs.utk.edu (klutz.cs.utk.edu [160.36.56.50]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5GKnKd3074145 for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:49:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from moore@cs.utk.edu)
Received: from localhost (klutz [127.0.0.1]) by klutz.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C884015B; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:49:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from klutz.cs.utk.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (klutz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05850-03; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:49:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from astro.cs.utk.edu (astro.cs.utk.edu [160.36.58.43]) by klutz.cs.utk.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6795D40103; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:49:18 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:49:17 -0400
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
To: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
Cc: moore@cs.utk.edu, ietf-smtp@imc.org
Subject: Re: request discussion of two documents on SMTP relaying
Message-Id: <20050616164917.6af33266.moore@cs.utk.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20050616202047.GY72337@verdi>
References: <42B095C2.3090703@cs.utk.edu> <20050616202047.GY72337@verdi>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.9 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386--netbsdelf)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.utk.edu by ClamAV and McAfee
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

>    Nonetheless, I have recently noticed that RFC2476 (Message Submission)
> is being updated. Specifically, an I-D has been approved by the IESG and
> forwarded to the rfc-editor:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gellens-submit-bis-02.txt
> 
>    I strongly recommend that folks read this carefully.
> 
>    Hopefully, nothing we might agree on will conflict with this RFC-to-be.
> Alas, some folks have been posting things which strike me as not fully
> consistent with the terminology of RFC 2476bis...

I do intend to try to reconcile my document with 2476bis, at least to
some degree.

>From a quick reading of 2476bis I have some issues with it (and I am
sorry I missed the Last Call), but I want to reread it to see if I like
the wording better on the second pass, and before proposing any
clarifications or fixes.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email