IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] [Emailcore] Proposed ESMTP keyword RCPTLIMIT

Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org> Mon, 19 April 2021 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jgh@wizmail.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362F33A4704 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=wizmail.org header.b=wm5PzENY; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wizmail.org header.b=H5a2AZUA
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UwmHFytV83h2 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizmail.org (wizmail.org [IPv6:2a00:1940:107::2:0:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D1B43A4703 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wizmail.org; s=e202001; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:References:To:From: Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post: List-Owner:List-Archive:Autocrypt; bh=pd7Q9k+gfaAhp/ZSfEnwAADMbP7PmukdOaT8F9AwDpo=; b=wm5PzENY82NVPk0diHQBkPXX+2 znMnv22o7rm2MQ8JGf+h3sEre+IZfbeE/dJ6HASMl/j2vME8rsAOtf/z3bCA==;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wizmail.org ; s=r202001; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:References:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post: List-Owner:List-Archive:Autocrypt; bh=pd7Q9k+gfaAhp/ZSfEnwAADMbP7PmukdOaT8F9AwDpo=; b=H5a2AZUA/C5epkINi4nDEHf0YA o5UImytQfxdDEua5ZoHsVI1nJ+8UOSBHtFrGnESvESo/fPS2XY2dQnTKglnLJOprAKOK97fzxnuTj fe18zUOWumguxAhmZXG8HBSDnMtdp8R7fdHZuHZ5WE89OO4h3Jpv2nh/hBELNffakiv8UVnoKkRsp JtFRPyNCCmsd9N7z8OncvFEupMvXMvAraqN5CLG1iP2ttg2tlWx4Jqj1tk7z2yKItFsrC7DoDAqtZ wM3Mb+WWR2Bque9b57D859ZNZJtqIdyRSRBHyYgnMQrON/zQnHtXCrZrido4LYdbHLeBRuQeQ4EVO dkmQw02Q==;
Authentication-Results: wizmail.org; iprev=pass (vgate18.wizint.net) smtp.remote-ip=2a00:1940:107::1:2f:0; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jgh@wizmail.org
Received: from vgate18.wizint.net ([2a00:1940:107::1:2f:0] helo=lap.dom.ain) by wizmail.org (Exim 4.94.122) (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 with esmtpsa id 1lYcOX-003aiK-UP for ietf-smtp@ietf.org (return-path <jgh@wizmail.org>); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 22:29:30 +0000
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
References: <cone.1615844513.220592.51342.1004@monster.email-scan.com> <20210315234648.563C0708B340@ary.qy> <CAO=DXp-+fJwsNegzu3zgwDLtCcSF104AUF=i+_GMgSYVBAKjWg@mail.gmail.com> <01RY24IJ225Q0085YQ@mauve.mrochek.com>
From: Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>
Message-ID: <d7e3c8d8-a3c8-801d-c2ea-1b4ccabed61b@wizmail.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:29:29 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <01RY24IJ225Q0085YQ@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Pcms-Received-Sender: vgate18.wizint.net ([2a00:1940:107::1:2f:0] helo=lap.dom.ain) with esmtpsa
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/s-f-5wVqsXwUiN891_j73K3-dUM>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] [Emailcore] Proposed ESMTP keyword RCPTLIMIT
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 22:29:39 -0000

On 19/04/2021 22:18, Ned Freed wrote:
> Are there any additional limits you think are sufficiently
> important, and perhaps more to the point, in some sense foundational, that they
> warrant being in the base specification?

Just came to mind: a limit on concurrent connections. By server IP seems
most obvious, but perhaps by recipient domain might be wanted in some
cases?

> I'm especially interested in people's thoughts on rate limits.

Much harder to define and handle than the limits so far defined.
I'd prefer to leave any such for a later spec.
-- 
Cheers,
   Jeremy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email