Re: DMARC stuff
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 22 October 2015 16:11 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406CA1B399B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OA3g6WsFYbmK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E025B1B399A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E758820098; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:14:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id EF003637F8; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:11:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9FA637F3; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:11:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: DMARC stuff
In-Reply-To: <20151022154248.4070.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <20151022154248.4070.qmail@ary.lan>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:11:43 -0400
Message-ID: <32433.1445530303@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0JUnC17E46tl8S8kCHvYFqXd0Q8>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:11:46 -0000
John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: > Subject line changed. >> GMail is set to turn on DMARC reject strict by sometime early next >> year [1] being one of the last big web mail providers to do so; so, >> Mailman "From:" rewriting (or turning on the ability for IETF list >> subscribers to toggle this for their sends) might need to be done for >> IETF lists. > Members of the DMARC group have submitted two drafts > draft-andersen-arc-00 and draft-jones-arc-usage-00 which describe a > mutation of DKIM intended to let mailing lists coexist with DMARC > without having to do ugly hacks like rewriting the From: line. I have > reason to believe that several large mail systems intend to implement > this reasonably soon. Can you at least summarize where the drafts are in the process, and if they require changes to senders, mailing lists, receivers, or all of the above? Are the proposals (which I guess are not yet adopted) complementary, or will a beauty contest be required? I think that ietf@ietf.org needs to know if we'll have a solution in time, or if the secretariat needs to be asked to deploy mailman 3 sooner. The very rough consensus a year ago was that we should wait for DMARC to do something, and here is something. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Robert Sparks
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Robert Sparks
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Ralph Droms
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Tim Wicinski
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Robert Sparks
- Google threatens to break Gmail Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Ross Finlayson
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives John Dickinson
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Russ Housley
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Dave Crocker
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Paul Wouters
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Robert Sparks
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Phillip Hallam-Baker
- DMARC stuff John Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John Levine
- Re: DMARC stuff Michael Richardson
- mailman [was: Google threatens to break Gmail] Miles Fidelman
- Re: DMARC stuff JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Rich Kulawiec
- Re: DMARC stuff John R Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Rich Kulawiec
- Re: DMARC stuff Dave Crocker
- Re: DMARC stuff Dave Crocker
- Re: DMARC stuff David Morris
- Re: DMARC stuff JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Brian E Carpenter
- Re: DMARC stuff Rich Kulawiec
- RE: Google threatens to break Gmail Christian Huitema
- Re: DMARC stuff John R Levine
- Re: DMARC stuff Dave Crocker
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Dave Crocker
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Martin Rex
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: mailman [was: Google threatens to break Gmail] John Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Randy Bush
- Re: mailman [was: Google threatens to break Gmail] Pierre-Elliott Bécue
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Ted Lemon
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Randy Bush
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Ted Lemon
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Paul Wouters
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John C Klensin
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail ned+ietf
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Philip Homburg
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Philip Homburg
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John C Klensin
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Jelte Jansen
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John R Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John C Klensin
- RE: Google threatens to break Gmail Ted Lemon
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John R Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Mark Rousell
- RE: Google threatens to break Gmail John C Klensin
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Ted Lemon
- Incremental hacks and letting abusers control the… Dave Crocker
- Re: Incremental hacks and letting abusers control… John C Klensin
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Martin Rex
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat.com)
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Dave Crocker
- Re: Incremental hacks and letting abusers control… Ted Lemon
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Dave Crocker
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Martin Rex
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Niels Dettenbach
- RE: Google threatens to break Gmail Ted Lemon
- RE: Google threatens to break Gmail {dkim-fail} ned+ietf
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail {dkim-fail} Hector Santos