DMARC stuff
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 22 October 2015 15:43 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9BE1B38E5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.363
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.363 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oLvZIkJMSgd4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC70D1ACEE6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 5738 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2015 15:43:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 22 Oct 2015 15:43:11 -0000
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:42:48 -0000
Message-ID: <20151022154248.4070.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: DMARC stuff
In-Reply-To: <CABtrr-Vh-+hLwYX8qjqC5rYrkE-8WZqy0YCgwHquFMAsdFqBaA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/nc-UVzCaY-Us3t1H_CI08CGh2DQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:43:14 -0000
>Totally the wrong thread, so I'll apologize profusely now. Subject line changed. >GMail is set to turn on DMARC reject strict by sometime early next >year [1] being one of the last big web mail providers to do so; so, >Mailman "From:" rewriting (or turning on the ability for IETF list >subscribers to toggle this for their sends) might need to be done for >IETF lists. Members of the DMARC group have submitted two drafts draft-andersen-arc-00 and draft-jones-arc-usage-00 which describe a mutation of DKIM intended to let mailing lists coexist with DMARC without having to do ugly hacks like rewriting the From: line. I have reason to believe that several large mail systems intend to implement this reasonably soon. The obvious place to discuss this is the DMARC WG, not here. R's, John
- Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Robert Sparks
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Robert Sparks
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Ralph Droms
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Tim Wicinski
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Robert Sparks
- Google threatens to break Gmail Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Ross Finlayson
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives John Dickinson
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Russ Housley
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Dave Crocker
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Paul Wouters
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives Robert Sparks
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Phillip Hallam-Baker
- DMARC stuff John Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John Levine
- Re: DMARC stuff Michael Richardson
- mailman [was: Google threatens to break Gmail] Miles Fidelman
- Re: DMARC stuff JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Rich Kulawiec
- Re: DMARC stuff John R Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Rich Kulawiec
- Re: DMARC stuff Dave Crocker
- Re: DMARC stuff Dave Crocker
- Re: DMARC stuff David Morris
- Re: DMARC stuff JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Brian E Carpenter
- Re: DMARC stuff Rich Kulawiec
- RE: Google threatens to break Gmail Christian Huitema
- Re: DMARC stuff John R Levine
- Re: DMARC stuff Dave Crocker
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Dave Crocker
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Martin Rex
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: mailman [was: Google threatens to break Gmail] John Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Randy Bush
- Re: mailman [was: Google threatens to break Gmail] Pierre-Elliott Bécue
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Ted Lemon
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Randy Bush
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Ted Lemon
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Paul Wouters
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John C Klensin
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail ned+ietf
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Philip Homburg
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Philip Homburg
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John C Klensin
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Jelte Jansen
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John R Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John C Klensin
- RE: Google threatens to break Gmail Ted Lemon
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John R Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Mark Rousell
- RE: Google threatens to break Gmail John C Klensin
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Ted Lemon
- Incremental hacks and letting abusers control the… Dave Crocker
- Re: Incremental hacks and letting abusers control… John C Klensin
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Martin Rex
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail John Levine
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat.com)
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Dave Crocker
- Re: Incremental hacks and letting abusers control… Ted Lemon
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Dave Crocker
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Martin Rex
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail Niels Dettenbach
- RE: Google threatens to break Gmail Ted Lemon
- RE: Google threatens to break Gmail {dkim-fail} ned+ietf
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail {dkim-fail} Hector Santos