Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing
Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net> Fri, 13 January 2017 16:15 UTC
Return-Path: <sbanks@encrypted.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265B91293EB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 08:15:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j550eCD7bT8I for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 08:15:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aws.hosed.org (aws.hosed.org [50.16.104.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F61B129413 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 08:15:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aws.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB4780408; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:15:30 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aws.hosed.org
Received: from aws.hosed.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aws.hosed.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y65ypV2IJcCP; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:15:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.222.173] (unknown [12.187.89.251]) by aws.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9351A80402; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:15:30 -0500 (EST)
From: Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5E4E83AE-9795-44EB-BFA1-2DFC0F9123DB"
Message-Id: <15F302B5-C4B7-4191-8B00-97DBD919FC6F@encrypted.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 08:15:29 -0800
References: <148425592769.2878.958252799399956970.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <02f401d26da8$655e7c30$301b7490$@olddog.co.uk> <f44d1fa2-19e9-f2eb-9991-21f85d58f6a9@gmail.com>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Alex Galis <a.galis@ucl.ac.uk>, jiangsheng@huawei.com
In-Reply-To: <f44d1fa2-19e9-f2eb-9991-21f85d58f6a9@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0h1YHARbFjbHlS3Uq2TpPmbK5JQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:15:34 -0000
It's worth pointing out that the 2 links that link to archives from the subscription page, to get a better idea of what this list is for, either show no info (the first link) or returns a 404 (the second link) https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices> /S > On Jan 13, 2017, at 7:39 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am not sure why there was no significant purpose text. > > In the note to subscribers we say: > > > This list is intended for discussion of network slicing to determine > an agreed IETF definition of the term Network Slicing, problems and > gaps to be covered with an aim to facilitate interoperation across > different operator and vendor solutions. The list also determines (and > assimilates) which elements of the slicing problems are already > covered by existing IETF designs or work in progress. > > - Stewart > > > On 13/01/2017 14:21, Adrian Farrel wrote: >> I hate to be a killjoy, but... >> >> Once upon a time the IESG used to supply a little text to include in this sort of announcement under the "Purpose" heading to allow us to work out whether we wanted to subscribe to the list. Since network slicing seems to be something that is done in a number of ways already, it would be nice to get a handle on what the purpose of this discussion forum is. >> >> Thanks, >> Adrian >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: IETF-Announce [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >>> IETF Secretariat >>> Sent: 12 January 2017 21:19 >>> To: IETF Announcement List >>> Cc: Kiran.Makhijani@huawei.com; a.galis@ucl.ac.uk; jiangsheng@huawei.com >>> Subject: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network Slicing >>> >>> >>> A new IETF non-working group email list has been created. >>> >>> List address: netslices@ietf.org >>> To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices >>> >>> Purpose: >>> >>> >>> For additional information, please contact the list administrators.
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … John C Klensin
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … Stewart Bryant
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … Adrian Farrel
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … Adrian Farrel
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … Stewart Bryant
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … Sarah B
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … Eliot Lear
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … Alex Galis
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … Eliot Lear
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … Terry Manderson
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … Lou Berger
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … Adrian Farrel
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … Terry Manderson
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … Loa Andersson
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … Terry Manderson
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … Loa Andersson
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: NetSlices - Network … BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A