Re: As if you don't have enough to read..

manning bill <bmanning@isi.edu> Fri, 13 March 2015 03:57 UTC

Return-Path: <bmanning@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A099C1A89FC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5etpFntiVDJP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 251371A8990 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.32.4.206] ([198.32.4.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t2D3uEOV002984 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: As if you don't have enough to read..
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: manning bill <bmanning@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <55025042.8020403@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:56:13 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EE3CF3B7-5F13-455A-A126-81AFF3F0A978@isi.edu>
References: <D127AF15.21B5B%richard@shockey.us> <55025042.8020403@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: bmanning@isi.edu
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0haHMz_6YPYUhoZDsaTZH5DmqM4>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:06:59 -0700
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 03:57:03 -0000


On 12March2015Thursday, at 19:49, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 13/03/2015 14:01, Richard Shockey wrote:
>> 
>> You are now officially part of the Public Switched Telephone Network of the
>> United States.
> 
> Not if you use RFC 1918, ULAs or link-local addresses, it seems.
> 
>    Brian
> 

	perhaps you are conflating use vs. definition.
 	clearly those IP addresses were defined in public, documented in public, and interoperate with other IP addresses.
	i think if they are used, and they can/do talk to other IP addresses, they fit the profile.

/bill
 

>> 
>> 
>> http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-2
>> 4A1.pdf
>> 
>> 
>> At Para 48  "Consistent with that delegation of authority to define these
>> terms, and 
>> with the Commission¹s previous recognition that the public switched
>> network will grow and change over time, this
>> Order updates the definition of public switched network to reflect
>> current technology, by including services that use public IP addresses."
>> 
>> ‹ 
>> Richard Shockey
>> Shockey Consulting LLC
>> Chairman of the Board SIP Forum
>> www.shockey.us
>> www.sipforum.org
>> richard<at>shockey.us
>> Skype-Linkedin-Facebook rshockey101
>> PSTN +1 703-593-2683
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>