IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Gen-art review of draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt

Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com> Tue, 07 March 2006 23:12 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGlM9-0005vP-Nu; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:12:41 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGlM7-0005vA-Oe; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:12:39 -0500
Received: from b.painless.aaisp.net.uk ([81.187.81.52] helo=smtp.aaisp.net.uk) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGlM6-0001J5-Gf; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:12:39 -0500
Received: from 247.254.187.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.187.254.247] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtp.aaisp.net.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1FGlM4-0004S9-O5; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:12:36 +0000
Message-ID: <440E13F6.1030905@dial.pipex.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:15:02 +0000
From: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
References: <43FAF79E.9040504@dial.pipex.com> <tslu0afjoz8.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <440DE58B.1040000@dial.pipex.com> <tslwtf6ezgu.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tslwtf6ezgu.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, Mary Barnes <mary.barnes@nortel.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Gen-art review of draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Hi.


Sam Hartman wrote:
> I am happy to make a change similar to the one you propose in section
> 1.
>
> I'm happy to split the parts of section 4 dealing with what the IESG
> might do into their own section as an example.
>   
That's fine by me.. it should make a self-consistent document.
> I do not want to remove them completely.
>
> Would that be OK
>   

As regards gen-art I think it would be fine.

Ultimately I am only a small part of the consensus as regards the 
experiment proposed.
Personally, I would prefer that we didn't have to waste inordinate 
amounts of time on mailing list management.  Unfortunately knocking 
virtual heads together isn't very effective.

/Elwyn

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email