Re: Gen-art review of draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt
Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Tue, 07 March 2006 21:07 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGjOd-0002Xn-FY; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 16:07:07 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGjOc-0002X3-2J; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 16:07:06 -0500
Received: from carter-zimmerman.dyn.mit.edu ([18.188.3.148] helo=carter-zimmerman.mit.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGjOb-0006av-Ti; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 16:07:06 -0500
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 3C93DE0053; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 16:06:57 -0500 (EST)
To: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
References: <43FAF79E.9040504@dial.pipex.com> <tslu0afjoz8.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <440DE58B.1040000@dial.pipex.com>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 16:06:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: <440DE58B.1040000@dial.pipex.com> (Elwyn Davies's message of "Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:56:59 +0000")
Message-ID: <tslwtf6ezgu.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, Mary Barnes <mary.barnes@nortel.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Gen-art review of draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
I am happy to make a change similar to the one you propose in section 1. I'm happy to split the parts of section 4 dealing with what the IESG might do into their own section as an example. I do not want to remove them completely. Would that be OK _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Gen-art review of draft-hartman-mailinglist-exper… Elwyn Davies
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-hartman-mailinglist-e… Sam Hartman
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-hartman-mailinglist-e… Elwyn Davies
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-hartman-mailinglist-e… Sam Hartman
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-hartman-mailinglist-e… Elwyn Davies
- Re: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of draft-hartman… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of draft-hartman… Sam Hartman
- RE: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review ofdraft-hartman-… Margaret Wasserman
- Perils of Last Minute Change (Was: RE: [Gen-art] … Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Perils of Last Minute Change (Was: RE: [Gen-a… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review ofdraft-hartman-… Sam Hartman
- RE: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review ofdraft-hartman-… Margaret Wasserman
- RE: Perils of Last Minute Change (Was: RE: [Gen-a… Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of draft-hartman… Harald Alvestrand