IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 12 November 2008 06:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000BA3A68D3; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:05:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDFE3A68D3 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:05:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.601, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pQSBJ7RcTGoT for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:05:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318D43A681D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:05:14 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,588,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="25340735"
Received: from ams-dkim-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.138]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2008 06:05:13 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mAC65DwZ031717; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:05:13 +0100
Received: from adsl-247-4-fixip.tiscali.ch (dhcp-10-61-101-50.cisco.com [10.61.101.50]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAC65DMU003625; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:05:13 GMT
Message-ID: <491A7219.9080500@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:05:13 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b2pre) Gecko/20081108 Shredder/3.0b1pre
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07
References: <20A6DC6F260C0847A77C1F9F61B309C6DEBA7069@exchange-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <002a01c94450$e20c5020$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <491A1D4E.4030700@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <491A1D4E.4030700@dcrocker.net>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=293; t=1226469913; x=1227333913; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; z=From:=20Eliot=20Lear=20<lear@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Comments=20on=20Draft=20IRTF=20ASRG=20D NSBL=20-=2007 |Sender:=20; bh=DVJrAQf2BxDzKgOEdFbxK3mqXD3WEmEq9asIkm2gGvw=; b=DOpN0r1mQ2Re/tGllG2e0yvJS6oFLGDKgvtFoPuxwUuWwW+uaiuY1EOAXk 7ntiISnICl7B7DPi7bp0DbXGiF3X2PbJFrr7KFxM2IRCCABNahy/P1WCgryI wxuXNn3VsL;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=lear@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
Cc: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On 11/12/08 1:03 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> Why?
>
> What are the specific aspects of this specification that fail to 
> qualify for Proposed Standard?

This is precisely what I want to know.
>
> What changes to the specification will fix these deficiencies?

What he said.

Eliot
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email