Re: I-D Action: draft-wilde-registries-01.txt

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Thu, 04 February 2016 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0371B3118; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:07:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uxMzlMn46RlF; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:07:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EB3E1B3111; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:07:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-x229.google.com with SMTP id wb13so68096104obb.1; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:07:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=PS7QYjqiC2b/nSI4pzaa0Skya3tyv9CxarcQWYiy+qU=; b=in/myWtQQT6PC4h6sU8LcUXSB8OhUmRFOUe9UxMYDr6+dyQR/djnF86plI4a65Stdz YDMAkt1R+grfvQAj1MNQP8SuwaeNEaeWmpvucdA3x8DUOi9B7n4g0f6NTG149UsqbPxP 11rnMg6ADWx4+UZ4SXrYpkm9AmhJ3ODmxlqQxBmSCpj6dJcp1vgktwmYmopil47XSHg6 ZylWf0fHEetRWDFJsWz0IKIfzuNbPsA9SRiTWxvmJ1MhApwIn91swhX6xGIg4ljvSn2D unXZUMMgLHVzTv9F+xeNGj7J0+cf82XwkTjLyShVfH/vJEOqiOT+KUKG7tfcZ7xt6sQc ViYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=PS7QYjqiC2b/nSI4pzaa0Skya3tyv9CxarcQWYiy+qU=; b=ifg5BsoqSgfXDGWC2RI/HkdgxQW+GQdOK1JoxpHsm53KKiQG9/bGhYprgP2tqBYbQP n2vEeI7dOe9xYv1pCwTtxnoz3PKfhekpcpqWSS7bDBAWchWwy1MHcFwPtaFZ4IYRNxJu NOIlJyINoZg0ChdxlmZ7sndLEO8gFgAmf9irpF64tRoE4Yd7M9CMX0yOeYn8HfQLKFMv 3ak7dHJdkXKU2J+piRiy/x4CCI+HIKW2QQcLDvWo/Ro7a4W2WJ0MLqvqZpCNIeV0e2VF a18/jSzTZGruuW3ZtzRl1IVJL+EJS11dh/O4jnlBvicAeQzztLYtyOv79CHLJ80HD9Fu IP7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQpHi3GZVZOH89QX46i1dKtHyouXkhL7b1SMbOwQPOy5hiIGqUYdeNGT1S+MRNFlFm/X+sug5TgcavJSw==
X-Received: by 10.182.210.234 with SMTP id mx10mr7616214obc.47.1454598448489; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:07:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.196.104 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:07:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20160204002816.9637.88320.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160204002816.9637.88320.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 10:07:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA=duU3WcXDzg9akOAKuQUFgewe1uN3i_ypbqoid=bX5qrskqw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-wilde-registries-01.txt
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2b464d02ad8052af317d7"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3rjG-3QP1rlsYkndmxS5gRT4-G4>
Cc: draft-wilde-registries@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:07:34 -0000

Interesting draft, but it should certainly contain references to RFCs 5226
and 7500, and you wouldn’t want to duplicate any information contained in
either of those RFCs. For example, there’s some amount of commonality
between section 5.3 of this draft and section 6.4 of RFC 5226.

Cheers,
Andy


On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 7:28 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>
>
>         Title           : The Use of Registries
>         Author          : Erik Wilde
>         Filename        : draft-wilde-registries-01.txt
>         Pages           : 13
>         Date            : 2016-02-03
>
> Abstract:
>    Registries on the Internet and the Web fulfill a wide range of tasks,
>    ranging from low-level networking aspects such as packet type
>    identifiers, all the way to application-level protocols and
>    standards.  This document summarizes some of the reasons of why and
>    how to use registries, and how some of them are operated.  It serves
>    as a informative reference for specification writers considering
>    whether to create and manage a registry, allowing them to better
>    understand some of the issues associated with certain design
>    discussions.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wilde-registries/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-registries-01
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wilde-registries-01
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>