IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr (Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes) to Informational RFC

Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Thu, 04 October 2007 06:35 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IdKJD-0007yw-VA; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 02:35:43 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IdKJB-0007s9-CP; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 02:35:41 -0400
Received: from netcore.fi ([193.94.160.1]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IdKJA-0006ed-Qc; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 02:35:41 -0400
Received: from netcore.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netcore.fi (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l946ZRUg001041; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:35:27 +0300
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l946ZRUZ001038; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:35:27 +0300
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:35:27 +0300
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <67602DA7-6B73-422C-95D3-7D216E0F388F@g11.org.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710040933010.965@netcore.fi>
References: <E1IcN17-0000Do-JA@stiedprstage1.ietf.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710021701060.11358@netcore.fi> <67602DA7-6B73-422C-95D3-7D216E0F388F@g11.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/4461/Wed Oct 3 11:50:48 2007 on otso.netcore.fi
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL, BAYES_00, TW_SV, TW_VW autolearn=no version=3.2.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on otso.netcore.fi
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr (Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, ken carlberg wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:
>> It is not clear that consensus in the IETF and deployments is strong enough 
>> to approve/recommend any specific treatment for standards track DSCP 
>> values.
>
> could you expand on this observation?

I don't recall when was the last (Diffserv-based) QoS talk at NANOG or 
similar operator-rich meeting.  (Sure, there is the tutorial, but it 
doesn't count.)

Seems like a potential indication that most typical ISPs aren't 
working on or interested in this, this stuff is so trivial, or that 
coordination is not necessary.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email