Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr (Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes) to Informational RFC

On Oct 4, 2007, at 2:35 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:

> On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, ken carlberg wrote:
>> On Oct 2, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:
>>> It is not clear that consensus in the IETF and deployments is  
>>> strong enough to approve/recommend any specific treatment for  
>>> standards track DSCP values.
>>
>> could you expand on this observation?
>
> I don't recall when was the last (Diffserv-based) QoS talk at NANOG  
> or similar operator-rich meeting.  (Sure, there is the tutorial,  
> but it doesn't count.)
>
> Seems like a potential indication that most typical ISPs aren't  
> working on or interested in this, this stuff is so trivial, or that  
> coordination is not necessary.

Dear Pekka;

FWIW, in the video conferencing world, DiffServe QOS is ubiquitous.  
(This is pretty frequently over internetworks, but not generally over  
the Internet.) The same is true for IPTV, but of course this is not  
yet internetwork much. I would rate it as too simple and too deployed  
for NANOG.

Regards
Marshall

>
> -- 
> Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf