Re: Questions about BCPs and WGs

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Wed, 10 July 2019 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E597120155 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JMdAswT-DrmN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38EBB12006B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id 44so3640316qtg.11 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nPwsd3wk3cdmePCYpdB4lLpyi78UoqZXmm0DOzgTBTc=; b=uxhjzy/YmSZSMcDnme5f7O2V4v/0iSDI3blMzaN9P4IAnyoMnl4gf0NElnvRO4oetF 6zYtPYSjQJcILsK+2mGHVYS01vYeErLCHNjcO0IkcAeIFpl+6MJT7QkBtH0pI2UlgozQ jSoThsgYYmEGydCq/7gpOoRS5ysaw7Qtce1oWkL0kEuB2HHfZuHnUmPygACAvGgdUx0W 0my6/xFJnLw/wZaH0TnCnnMLtDuCnuv1wOcaBlMW0JBVlfcKNJwaRFJyctDUxdGUlyaf wrfe7ZMBiOOCVLRUI5ctmbRjKi0IM/m3ewYkJbjHb3W16FetksoywabQbDleCTHX8zwU nz6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nPwsd3wk3cdmePCYpdB4lLpyi78UoqZXmm0DOzgTBTc=; b=O7SoTWsfH/kzQca/c87Qx3yw3oR0TnJM0pm12Vyzb7RfjD3vsiBVaNytqAwGACXcYj X+vnKtSUbKiy2DGhg10S9S7kEyL4eYtOF2PNAduihmR6dKqVszk1lG5/qxrkHkEalMNM GxxO25sjw4Giv4Mh/HYUOVJt0g0iDXq2ofvmYemdg1MO7ISgRHi/GM8SzPWUoHWdkeU4 ZujCcWs820KPgIkWq2Z4pQYMKYy5ntzxPZZbAZm6bsU8yM6gkhCDtfUA9W+aDpOPwkRM RKUV85Uzsw7EK2LOTxaqPK59+CL+fHcDW8qocOgDHk/t9e68ofGWNONolXxjrVbNtcsI oqrg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUJkXpBmwqoDpeeY98+h4AlZ1Yu5HoX4L68unF8CNW2ViY6iHs6 gChK7mrMujCmuk9et5ibNM0N67wtbz/qe/Bqscg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxbkmDKwDfNtUBII7c3+y36NiL77QiakW5FNuYbl/bY0mTiedZGeZpI7unGoQeyhnvCzc5+Nqh/et6xYmE75DQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:d6ca:: with SMTP id l10mr26142390qvi.4.1562786058149; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7989576e-ad21-6aec-e2e9-0a029e924ef3@eff.org>
In-Reply-To: <7989576e-ad21-6aec-e2e9-0a029e924ef3@eff.org>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 15:14:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU1TE-48yB7QziiY6Q-FFxS0K7k8v7VfhmtnApavYyqwDw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Questions about BCPs and WGs
To: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000db23a9058d587ba9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4OBjh84zdeQo-7GfVBmvH-003wI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 19:14:21 -0000

Jacob,

A "BCP" is one of several types of RFC. BCPs are used to document a "Best
Current Practice" in the IETF or the Internet. They are described in
section 5 of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026 .

The "Network Working Group" was the historical original source of RFCs
prior to the IETF. The "Network Working Group" attribution in RFCs was kept
for many years in the IETF as a sort of homage. Lately, as you've noticed,
it's been updated to "IETF".

As others have noted, you should bring up this discussion on "art@ietf.org".

But you picked the right first place to ask!

Cheers,
Andy


On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 1:17 PM Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> wrote:

> Hi IETF folks,
>
> I have a few questions about IETF processes that I hope you all can
> answer. I'm coming at these questions as someone who has participated in
> a number of WGs, co-authored one RFC and one RFC-to-be, but still
> doesn't fully understand the processes.
>
> I'm looking at BCP 190 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp190). How do I
> figure out which WG this document was developed in? It doesn't have a
> working group listed in the header, nor does the corresponding RFC
> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7320).
>
> Also, what's the difference between a BCP and an RFC?
>
> If I look at the document that BCP 190 Updates
> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986) it lists the "Network Working
> Group." What is that? I don't see it listed under
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/.
>
> In general, if I want to discuss amendments to BCP 190, what mailing
> list would I use to start that conversation?
>
> Thanks,
> Jacob
>
>