Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 24 May 2016 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC38512D554 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 04:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WLzeYoV-8uWk for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 04:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E14AF12D125 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 04:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.9] (unknown [210.213.187.0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85E5F18013E4; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:44:46 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, 'Alia Atlas' <akatlas@gmail.com>
References: <032801d1b59e$09eb97b0$1dc2c710$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <decec1d6-69f6-80f7-595c-7621d9ac4020@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 19:44:40 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <032801d1b59e$09eb97b0$1dc2c710$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5LkWYanxgPQ1B79oeOn1AG9HpEA>
Cc: 'IETF Discussion Mailing List' <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 11:44:51 -0000


On 2016-05-24 17:24, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Alia,
>
>> I've wondered about whether it would help/add to have pictures of IETFers
>> associated with their IETF datatracker account.   We do have a gallery of
>> photos for WG chairs, but I have no sense of how much those are used.
>
> I have repeatedly been told that the WG chair photos are really useful for people attending f2f meetings who want to seek out chairs to talk with them. The same would probably apply to any IETFer with whom they wanted to make contact at an f2f meeting.
>
yes I agree to that, photos are useful

does "assiciated with their IETF datatracker account" mean that when you
go to the status page of a draft the photos of the authors would show
up? would be really neat :).

A wrinkle coould be to display the photos of wg chairs on the charter
and/or the document page.

> [snip]
>
>> I would love to figure out how to recreate the types of serendipitous interactions
>> and 'hallway' conversations that happen - but in an on-line setting.
>
> A few years back the IESG caused the creation of hallway@jabber.ietf.org. When I was on the IESG I tried to remember to hang out there when my jabber client was open. I think a couple of other ADs tried as well. As I recall, it was very rare for anyone else to be there and over a couple of years I think I fielded just one question.
>

yes - I remember the hallway@jabber.ietf.org, the idea is good, but I 
guess that there are better applications that could be used today - in
a totally different context I've been using Telegram (not a suggestion,
just an example) and it works well. Though I don't know how big groups
that could be accommodated.

/Loa
> Adrian
>