Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: IETF-822

James Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com> Fri, 15 June 2012 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E5121F864E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.698, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yKCauZD0JvNl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDDF21F850B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; l=632; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1339782593; x=1340992193; h=message-id:date:to:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=kZDrS3tv9qeHFtAnyTjn9FrXqlDCNiY0DwJsOv+HSx8=; b=dbQsyiXtZTqkcPeL8OsBtlakzq2JgXGO/HYogK/C4Cbu7Z9fsOv5jp1h BfQGNctbhSKBMB5RcYW2rJpdnn287dzF5CLIyL16xyX4f8Ts3fuXYvBFo n5blZ7n/Nc7gMzfSskZJAa5nwOsZahO01sxX2KDZrLHACx93dMMixtnjw Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAMx020+rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABFtVSBB4IYAQEBBBIBJQI0CxAHBA4KHhAZPgYBEiKHaJlhoCWLNoYRA4hCmnmBZoJ+
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,779,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="49109002"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Jun 2012 17:49:52 +0000
Received: from jmpolk-WS.cisco.com (rcdn-jmpolk-8714.cisco.com [10.99.80.21]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5FHnpRL003924; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:49:51 GMT
Message-Id: <201206151749.q5FHnpRL003924@mtv-core-1.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:49:30 -0500
To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
From: James Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: IETF-822
In-Reply-To: <DE6911BA-1AF0-45FC-8A0A-34BBB4C3BEA5@checkpoint.com>
References: <20120614213751.1985.262.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4FDA5B22.4040507@stpeter.im> <DE6911BA-1AF0-45FC-8A0A-34BBB4C3BEA5@checkpoint.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:49:54 -0000

At 01:46 AM 6/15/2012, Yoav Nir wrote:

>On Jun 15, 2012, at 12:44 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
> > On 6/14/12 3:37 PM, IETF Secretariat wrote:
> >
> >> List address: ietf-822@ietf.org
> >
> > Is no one thinking ahead to the 822nd meeting of the IETF in the year
> > 2258?!?
>
>Well, I've started working on 
>draft-nir-ipv6-were-finally-deploying-it but I'm not sure what 
>format would be an appropriate submission format in the 23rd century.
>
>Doesn't it coincide with the 1st season of Babylon 5?

a B5 reference... this doesn't happen often enough IMO

BTW - 2258 was the second season of B5.


>Yoav