Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: IETF-822

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 15 June 2012 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489FE21F8510 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ariT3CoXikTo for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728AB21F84FC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (adsl-67-127-55-201.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.127.55.201]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5FK8GaF028076 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:08:17 -0700
Message-ID: <4FDB962B.2030101@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:08:11 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: IETF-822
References: <20120615195854.71801.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20120615195854.71801.qmail@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:08:18 -0000

On 6/15/2012 12:58 PM, John Levine wrote:
> It hardly seems worth the effort, since the only difference between
> ASCII and FoPSCII is that the ASCII # is replaced by the modern
> currency symbol, and, of course, they put the little gap back in the
> vertical bar to resolve the concerns about religious and cultural
> insensitivty.


The more important questions are: who invented FoPSCII and how old were 
they?

d/

ps. the less important question is how many folk don't get the reference?

-- 
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net