Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]

Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Mon, 18 September 2006 07:17 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPDNW-00019B-0N; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 03:17:18 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPDNU-00018N-56 for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 03:17:16 -0400
Received: from mtagate4.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPDFv-0000Ma-PT for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 03:09:30 -0400
Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate4.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8I79MQh102182 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 07:09:22 GMT
Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.212]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id k8I7BZ8b1900702 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 08:11:35 +0100
Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k8I79MZe014034 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 08:09:22 +0100
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8I79Lws014025; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 08:09:22 +0100
Received: from zurich.ibm.com ([9.4.210.83]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA172842; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:09:21 +0200
Message-ID: <450E4622.2050308@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:09:22 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD37DD513D@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
In-Reply-To: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD37DD513D@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Phill,

> As a result the IETF is a standards body with 2000 active participants that produces on average less than 3 standards a year
> and typically takes ten years to produce even a specification.

It is well understood that the Internet mainly runs on Proposed Standards,
so the appropriate metric is how many Proposed Standards the IETF produces
a year. I think you will find that is more than three.

We are certainly slower than we should be, but I think you will find that
the typical time from a 00 draft to a Proposed Standard is significantly
less than ten years.

Let's see - HTTP/1.1 was published as Proposed Standard in January 1997,
and draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-00.txt was posted in November 1995.

    Brian


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf