RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]

"Kyse Faril" <greensowstiki@hotmail.com> Sun, 22 October 2006 20:44 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbkB8-00080D-1b; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:44:18 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbkB2-000800-Dk for Ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:44:12 -0400
Received: from bay0-omc1-s24.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.96]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbkB1-0004WI-1E for Ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:44:12 -0400
Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.168.23]) by bay0-omc1-s24.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:44:10 -0700
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:44:10 -0700
Message-ID: <BAY113-F13DF44F7B2B92F338B6099B3030@phx.gbl>
Received: from 65.54.168.200 by by113fd.bay113.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:44:05 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [75.18.209.167]
X-Originating-Email: [greensowstiki@hotmail.com]
X-Sender: greensowstiki@hotmail.com
In-Reply-To: <450E4622.2050308@zurich.ibm.com>
From: Kyse Faril <greensowstiki@hotmail.com>
To: brc@zurich.ibm.com
Bcc:
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:44:05 -0600
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2006 20:44:10.0861 (UTC) FILETIME=[D3BD29D0:01C6F61A]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69
Cc: Ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

In regards to: '3 standards a year' remark?
Please see 'these remarks' on;
'San Francisco Digital Inclusion Strategy'
http://leftinsf.com/blog/index/php/archives/1174
And my remark is why not a 'standard'...for Three Years? (PROTO-TYPE)



>From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
>To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
>CC: ietf@ietf.org
>Subject: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant 
>the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
>Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:09:22 +0200
>
>Phill,
>
>>As a result the IETF is a standards body with 2000 active participants 
>>that produces on average less than 3 standards a year
>>and typically takes ten years to produce even a specification.
>
>It is well understood that the Internet mainly runs on Proposed Standards,
>so the appropriate metric is how many Proposed Standards the IETF produces
>a year. I think you will find that is more than three.
>
>We are certainly slower than we should be, but I think you will find that
>the typical time from a 00 draft to a Proposed Standard is significantly
>less than ten years.
>
>Let's see - HTTP/1.1 was published as Proposed Standard in January 1997,
>and draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-00.txt was posted in November 1995.
>
>    Brian
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ietf mailing list
>Ietf@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_________________________________________________________________
Add a Yahoo! contact to Windows Live Messenger for a chance to win a free 
trip! 
http://www.imagine-windowslive.com/minisites/yahoo/default.aspx?locale=en-us&hmtagline


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf