IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent

Sebastian Kiesel <ietf-alto@skiesel.de> Tue, 05 July 2016 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <sebi@gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85E212D54F; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 06:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.325
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.325 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HvmHP9MUqb3h; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 06:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de (gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de [IPv6:2a02:a00:e000:116::41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A7CC12D090; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 06:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sebi by gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <sebi@gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de>) id 1bKQCO-0007hb-CV; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:15:36 +0200
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:15:36 +0200
From: Sebastian Kiesel <ietf-alto@skiesel.de>
To: "Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu>
Subject: Re: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
Message-ID: <20160705131536.GF3915@gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de>
References: <20160627154219.5272.69338.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FB0FFB23-8212-4B6A-B346-3C191588063F@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <0383A843-1CBF-4178-A5BA-266A8FEA4A27@cisco.com> <CANUuoLrHOmC90uQj4dusFyEW5R+QGpcUbLhShfQ7X37P+eQ+pA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANUuoLrHOmC90uQj4dusFyEW5R+QGpcUbLhShfQ7X37P+eQ+pA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Languages: en, de
Organization: my personal mail account
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8IyO6KW3Tk0bEQtF8Z8zNHP70tQ>
Cc: "draft-ietf-alto-deployments@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-alto-deployments@ietf.org>, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 13:15:55 -0000

Richard,

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 07:57:45PM -0400, Y. Richard Yang wrote:
> I am reading up the patent application.
> 
> Given that one of the inventors is Sabine, who is a quite active member of
> this WG, could we ask her to take one more look at the deployment document
> and share any comments on potential relevance, if any?

I am not sure whether this makes sense.

Assuming that Sabine made the invention but did not write the patent text 
herself, her analysis might be more or less biased by her original idea.
However, our problem now is not (so much) what the original invention
was, but more what could be considered by lawyers as being covered by
the wording of the patents.

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email