Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com> Tue, 18 November 2008 19:22 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD373A6B13; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:22:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17133A6B0B; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:22:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VlU0qdJOGzXR; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:22:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2373A6B04; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:22:45 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,626,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="28254507"
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2008 19:22:44 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mAIJMi2r014946; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:22:44 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAIJMiH4018192; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:22:44 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:22:44 -0500
Received: from 10.21.93.2 ([10.21.93.2]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:22:43 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:22:41 -0500
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
From: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <C5488031.43684%mshore@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Thread-Index: AclJswZGRNe1GLWmEd2rwwAKleNSdA==
In-Reply-To: <49231473.6070801@psg.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2008 19:22:44.0429 (UTC) FILETIME=[08514FD0:01C949B3]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=447; t=1227036164; x=1227900164; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mshore@cisco.com; z=From:=20Melinda=20Shore=20<mshore@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[73attendees]=20Is=20USA=20qualified=20 for=0A=202.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-crite ria? |Sender:=20 |To:=20Randy=20Bush=20<randy@psg.com>,=20Scott=20W=20Brim=2 0<sbrim@cisco.com>; bh=MrCJ2bqK7vkvbrlbuOXOTIlw3NNOImTNaBnXWmAnbQ8=; b=aKZqPM2Iy7U9dClak0zna161jDMmPWdp7Epudkrc84n/9JeAOyVm8QWIHK 4qv4mUJNGYTNy/mrTCszX3JsC60BKx6khW8aK8m9lYaZGUnfjz+w5I0GChNJ ApMYbfyAGo;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=mshore@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
On 11/18/08 2:16 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote: >> How would you solve the problem? > hold the meetings in non-terrorist countries. i.e. not the united states. I don't know what that means. Canada, for example, is a peacekeeper nation that requires visas for entry from countries from which there are many IETF participants (India, China). Is the issue the visa requirement itself or is it how visas are processed? Melinda _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- RE: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Eric Gray
- Re:[73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraft… 张国强
- RE: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ross Callon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… qdang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Marc Manthey
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Gene Gaines
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Matthew Ford
- RE: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… James Seng
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fernando Gont
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Tom.Petch
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- RE: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- RE: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Nicholas Weaver
- RE: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Quigley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Fred Baker
- RE: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… Fleischman, Eric
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Morris
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Raj Yaralagadda
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Phillip Hallam-baker