IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re:[73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

" 张国强 " <zhangguoqiang@cnnic.cn> Tue, 18 November 2008 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6204C28C1F1; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:41:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C513A69D4 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:15:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.468
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.163, BAYES_50=0.001, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_103=0.327, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HC0YGBr5Kwt6 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp.cnnic.cn [159.226.7.146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2313A3A6932 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:15:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: (eyou send program); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:14:36 +0800
Message-ID: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn>
Received: from 130.129.31.3 by mail.cnnic.cn with HTTP; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:14:36 +0800
X-WebMAIL-MUA: [130.129.31.3]
From: 张国强 <zhangguoqiang@cnnic.cn>
To: healthyao@gmail.com, ietf@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:14:36 +0800
X-Priority: 3
Subject: Re:[73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:41:00 -0800
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: 张国强 <zhangguoqiang@cnnic.cn>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1862737104=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

yes, it's really a problem that IETF meeting organizers should seriously consider.



ÔÚÄúµÄÀ´ÐÅÖÐÔø¾­Ìáµ½:
>From: "YAO" <healthyao@gmail.com>
>Reply-To: 
>To: <ietf@ietf.org>
>Subject: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
>Date:Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:24:41 +0800
>
>
> 
> according to IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04#section-2.3
> 
> which said "
> 
> 2.3.  Freedom of Participation
> 
>    Meetings should not be held in countries where some attendees could
>    be disallowed entry or where freedom of speech is not guaranteed for
>    all participants.
> "
> 
> My question is :"
> 
> Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria as
IETF Meeting Venue ?"
> 
> It seems that many IETFer are disallowed to enter USA for ietf meeting when ietf
is held in USA this time or other times
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> 73attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
>



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email