RE: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors)
"Burger, Eric" <eburger@cantata.com> Fri, 23 June 2006 20:17 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fts5X-000325-5t; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:17:11 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fts5W-00031D-1A for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:17:10 -0400
Received: from mxgate1.brooktrout.com ([204.176.74.10]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fts5U-0000Yw-QE for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:17:10 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.06,170,1149480000"; d="scan'208"; a="34556013:sNHT41437296"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:18:40 -0400
Message-ID: <330A23D8336C0346B5C1A5BB196666470317AB2A@ATLANTIS.Brooktrout.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors)
Thread-Index: AcZPfIcMWY1OG2rEQ3SldUhHxgb5bRHL7rwg
From: "Burger, Eric" <eburger@cantata.com>
To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e1e48a527f609d1be2bc8d8a70eb76cb
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
I would offer that in *some* groups the running code bar is reasonable. For example, in SIPPING, the problem space is pretty well-defined, and there are third-party specifications and requirements out there. There have been way too many half-baked ideas floated for consideration, and that has sucked the life blood out of the work group. As I have mentioned on the SIPPING list, this is NOT a prescription for all proposals or work groups in the IETF. However, the idea is reasonable for *some* work groups in the IETF. I think raising the bar isn't going to hurt. The "they'll take the idea to another standards body" doesn't hold water if there is no code / prototype / product to promote. -----Original Message----- From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore@cs.utk.edu] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 2:50 PM To: Dave Cridland Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net; ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors) [snip] It may be that we place too much emphasis on running code in IETF today. In ARPAnet days, when the user community was small and homogeneous but platforms were diverse (different word/character sizes, different character sets, different limitations of operating systems and networking hardware), and goals for protocols were modest, merely being able to implement a protocol across different platforms was one of the biggest barriers to adoption. In that environment, being able to demonstrate running code on multiple platforms was nearly sufficient to demonstrate the viability of a protocol. Besides, since the net was small, it wasn't terribly hard to make changes should they be found to be necessary. These days running code serves as proof-of-concept and also as a way to validate the specification. It doesn't say anything about the quality of the design - not efficiency, nor usability, nor scalability, nor security. etc. [snip] _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- RE: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- RE: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- RE: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Burger, Eric
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Burger, Eric
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Michael Thomas
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Michael Thomas
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… John Levine
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… John R Levine
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… John R Levine
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Michael Thomas
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Michael Thomas
- Fostering reviews (was Re: are we willing to do c… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… John R Levine
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Tim Bray
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Dave Crocker
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Dave Crocker
- Re: Fostering reviews (was Re: are we willing to … Dave Crocker
- Re: Fostering reviews (was Re: are we willing to … marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: Fostering reviews (was Re: are we willing to … Dave Crocker
- Re: Fostering reviews (was Re: are we willing to … marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: Fostering reviews (was Re: are we willing to … Dave Crocker
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Fostering reviews (was Re: are we willing to … marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: Fostering reviews (was Re: are we willing to … Dave Crocker
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- RE: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Tony Finch
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Stephen Farrell
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Dave Cridland
- Re: Fostering reviews (was Re: are we willing to … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Tony Finch
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Stephen Farrell
- not listening Michael Thomas
- Re: not listening Keith Moore
- Re: not listening Michael Thomas
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: not listening Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- RE: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Robert Sayre
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Robert Sayre
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: not listening Eliot Lear
- Re: not listening Dave Crocker
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Dave Crocker
- Re: not listening Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Tom.Petch
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Eliot Lear
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Ned Freed
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Eliot Lear
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Dave Crocker
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- RE: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Michael Thomas
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Keith Moore
- Re: are we willing to do change how we do discuss… Brian E Carpenter