IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IAB statement on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 28 November 2013 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7321AE127 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:06:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9l9Zzp62ausx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:06:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8B71ADF89 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:06:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rASK6Gxo016398; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:06:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1385669181; bh=Ez/jmb4BwEL4hRiAME4FewtBAI58HV2IL0cPN6niA+Q=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=B3Ygpcte3w0qR9YC4h6T3goaL2ivG9DCyOPQDOX6SaoP+sQccv5Ek8PLrcDg/bShB H8tsCs4cvaJHiesteh5O9vPeoTAt8iCtx9LOwmJzV2GfAI9yn01CM6qQFl4RXKBsJg RxoZdqc5F28G8/+NUk09XUt51XAruSKXT8KM30Rg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1385669181; i=@resistor.net; bh=Ez/jmb4BwEL4hRiAME4FewtBAI58HV2IL0cPN6niA+Q=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=PeyHKon/J+AtSz4gFr1BmECjVIzH10sQh9/y4wbqgjR2aJuYG1qNaPzHquEzyf1yM ub/jiMat8qNKk1sJ2bOmVod8PkPs2DaHUZCsc3ekI6v8qq/zvhRx58ZMSEHFYNlWSL qZOj0fRMRDzjNcvuIatDw5LP/ft9kKgQ46E+wD00=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20131128113938.0bbf0be8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:58:26 -0800
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: IAB statement on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ89PxsBxZqG3e8ZfUsk9hNJXzNkmOfCm3_gSYHFThuAFDw@mail.g mail.com>
References: <E2DA1477-C86E-441E-A33D-D47A0D67AFF3@iab.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20131127084710.0dd761c0@resistor.net> <CADnDZ89PxsBxZqG3e8ZfUsk9hNJXzNkmOfCm3_gSYHFThuAFDw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 20:06:28 -0000

Hi Abdussalam,
At 17:06 27-11-2013, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
>What do our protocol designers think about that mitigation 
>possibility and about that protocol attack consideration?

There may be some information at 
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/minutes/minutes-88-perpass

>Does the draft explain "Mitigate the attack" in user favours? users 
>will think every thing is possible.
>
>What does "where possible" mean here? Is it clear for readers or it 
>is just me?

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGPmTS6HcGs

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email