Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10.txt> (A Media Type for Reputation Interchange) to Proposed Standard
SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 29 August 2013 16:09 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD47A21F888F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.527
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.527 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BcN219IsVyCu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001F821F9CF3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7TG8Y2m021339; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1377792523; bh=N7HeyDppunzh05rxYC5Vk13so3wj5RIUIa+fgG+IyzM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=XdVrQVtrD7JNZIbrASusEIFOqPrSBc7iemD696+mREhgD0p9L7Ls/LNFuKlKRFt1s SLjy6g0Gf9Dzgiixt/hkq9tOkkcChe6nNJrfC+ct2MoahVPuBDcAtVDoMaHma6C9iL Ed9fDxCl1/daSJMNuw1XOHhyHJhMNm37ccqjz3NE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1377792523; i=@resistor.net; bh=N7HeyDppunzh05rxYC5Vk13so3wj5RIUIa+fgG+IyzM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=n4k4FVQJeLv/AJPDEeFBes76BBNwq6qXStDGKDGR91WddEo/ubzzc32fULWSPY/gL bsxq3aGBUBEzm7npl4y+LOh2DoCq3keW4SCbA+eLpwa83s2VPGf9AATji7T0jvnqv/ xvIn0/0+xMLTn0IKZQgyOAO4Sx4Ef+W/ZbPe8N08=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130829084632.0cef9ac8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 08:50:14 -0700
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10.txt> (A Media Type for Reputation Interchange) to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYFXkB5E-5u5PykJu5BztLdhutzJoC41B2k85Lce87cGQ@mail.g mail.com>
References: <20130815144419.712.35650.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130815102618.0b86a4e0@resistor.net> <CAL0qLwYFXkB5E-5u5PykJu5BztLdhutzJoC41B2k85Lce87cGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:09:57 -0000
Hi Murray, At 00:05 21-08-2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >As alluded to above, there can be quite a bit of information needed >for an application to be defined beyond the defaults assumed when a >name is registered. There didn't seem to be any need to require >such definition to be in an IETF document, but it also seems as >though more information than what's needed with just FCFS or DE or >the other lesser rules is appropriate either. I'll suggest Expert Review here as it is a lesser barrier. I'll defer to you on this. Regards, -sm