Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice
SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 29 August 2013 16:10 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8337421F9EB5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.452
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.009, BAYES_00=-2.599, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uDe6hyQsPp5N for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9643721F9D18 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7TG8Y2k021339; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1377792519; bh=anmAUVbD1iXvzUr6mjTSeBfRGyXXF2bIQtg/4u2Xs84=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=4zmGvGNNU38/BX1hE0uTJvYB3A62dxNWQyCVoQk+92lYkLWKnCqwMtP6I1mtWqWb9 9zH6IQI55xSPnN3VSkJi+ZAuE0VmUk+ElaWKhCHzhHU6VQypQ0MYpTu3kNDwWM23zI oRXegZCpPiJfyxBfaUY/UM60SeZURTbkZOWJgmUg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1377792519; i=@resistor.net; bh=anmAUVbD1iXvzUr6mjTSeBfRGyXXF2bIQtg/4u2Xs84=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=j4ssH5DKE/ZH4PxmLkd3oAaEiMyhD5RdiRdW3uTooIHKQaIi1Gto6lIJVbtrWIL/a TIWt+QXwjmYoIh7u6Qtb7SkVLmQewaIoznrp7IGkWUwSAdQIqLDWMAzR0a5uJxmrpp Qo3Hft3OGvL/IqLEECMJR1cuRfx/4IYuNQHyIwBw=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130829083719.0cf0d4b0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 08:44:02 -0700
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice
In-Reply-To: <20130827215216.30701.52572.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20130827215216.30701.52572.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:10:33 -0000
At 14:52 27-08-2013, The IESG wrote: >The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider >the following document: >- 'Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points' > <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> as Best Current Practice > >The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the >ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-09-24. Exceptionally, comments may be In Section 2: 'a. The code points must be from a space designated as "Specification Required" (where an RFC will be used as the stable reference), "RFC Required", "IETF Review", or "Standards Action".' I suggest not having the comment (where) and leaving it to RFC 5226 to define "Specification Required". Regards, -sm