Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 29 August 2013 16:43 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD2F11E812C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.082, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gb9H7zzEQi90 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ve0-x22a.google.com (mail-ve0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE73311E8128 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 15so530612vea.29 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZSiPHaHug5lipqWJcJHJt3xP5eUyEbJFf5P6EwM1jyU=; b=UF+qDf9H6jHNQm1kf/khCw9nmphqStKUhVqXdGhgqpVPHZth8a4KEC+zrN71AoNZU8 7gojMGOVFfAGwIoUUhgmkvdPzAYsfoANRjkAq0FjXvZO4jZYLkV7Ct0y2KQ8b2nmkNrY 0kv0YTK6DLdZOzYhpiJMxfFRS+pO/9o5xA7Hjfulu/JWGsBzomAR5oVLiTCH2mYw/VeP etlbuxdJiGN0Vkbsc0i4Q45k9lOXwz8KVG0w5nLjD17uquq8eK8cIkz1zviHShYReXI+ 9FlDBIpZvhD0qwVpc70IOIGc29pTVko+kjs4Ecin7YFaIMNDwS/TctsdEDX8ExnosEIl jtRw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.221.27.73 with SMTP id rp9mr1615918vcb.29.1377794580326; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.58.215.16 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130829083719.0cf0d4b0@resistor.net>
References: <20130827215216.30701.52572.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130829083719.0cf0d4b0@resistor.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:43:00 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0nIsd0vzx37qhai8gidrxp5dMWA
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVCFyiJbYZFYqz2cYcm3o=Ms0QRXLVTfXRSXt-rKQhWw2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:43:02 -0000
> In Section 2: > > 'a. The code points must be from a space designated as "Specification > Required" (where an RFC will be used as the stable reference), > "RFC Required", "IETF Review", or "Standards Action".' > > I suggest not having the comment (where) and leaving it to RFC 5226 to > define "Specification Required". Yes, except that's not what this means. I tripped over the same text, and I suggest rephrasing it this way: NEW The code points must be from a space designated as "Specification Required" (in cases where an RFC will be used as the stable reference), "RFC Required", "IETF Review", or "Standards Action". Barry