Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice
SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 29 August 2013 17:12 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAA111E8142 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.452
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.009, BAYES_00=-2.599, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XI1sSOsgLX-p for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEA211E8141 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7THCK77011969; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1377796344; bh=wMkAKlZCM3Ct+XYtLJjXo/XZAzFRsICcfdIbyh0lw5A=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=yY1JY9jlW7xcdrb1n5UH2ns1UeMfCvjICLxxf+kQD2ORmZIc1X+Zacpo4yaAOCkRc +surdeDRdqBI7O0QJljPquztznOvOGyrbbxgwDhpXXudn8DPjSdMrx6X3XgNcrrQ8h lAmDPy8qIvCrE/SAiXp3JJSwePvnnyBhKwu0mKGU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1377796344; i=@resistor.net; bh=wMkAKlZCM3Ct+XYtLJjXo/XZAzFRsICcfdIbyh0lw5A=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=BkN+3IqHIm1A+R13gjlN42oYDhcqdV3QeGAwYnMzRKOl7gLOp6y/RD2QR9NMOwJ2q LByTO1GUflnc9ovTESAxA1t72VgJp8G+NYzYdkLwCH20Mo0rAwCzzV+CyEVJnsHmfJ CnQ7sbT3/YWnHYqmkCCEV0OzOVBNDB3+BvKi4vBs=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130829095350.0cf0db18@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:56:34 -0700
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCFyiJbYZFYqz2cYcm3o=Ms0QRXLVTfXRSXt-rKQhWw2Q@mail.g mail.com>
References: <20130827215216.30701.52572.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130829083719.0cf0d4b0@resistor.net> <CAC4RtVCFyiJbYZFYqz2cYcm3o=Ms0QRXLVTfXRSXt-rKQhWw2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:12:36 -0000
Hi Barry, At 09:43 29-08-2013, Barry Leiba wrote: >I tripped over the same text, and I suggest rephrasing it this way: > >NEW > The code points must be from a space designated as "Specification > Required" (in cases where an RFC will be used as the stable reference), > "RFC Required", "IETF Review", or "Standards Action". That looks better. Regards, -sm