RE: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observations-00.txt
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 15 October 2012 21:53 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB6A21F8AD7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id narIEId4mzuC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E222321F8AD5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9FLr9Fx025578; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:53:09 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (westford-nat.juniper.net [66.129.232.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9FLr5o0025541 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:53:07 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Randy Bush' <randy@psg.com>
References: <042001cdab1d$df26b6b0$9d742410$@olddog.co.uk> <m21ugzjtia.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m21ugzjtia.wl%randy@psg.com>
Subject: RE: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observations-00.txt
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:53:07 +0100
Message-ID: <042501cdab1f$77f31e50$67d95af0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGQ8uxwXwblegDWCOchl9n//24rKQKUvTE/mB+ypPA=
Content-Language: en-gb
Cc: 'IETF Disgust' <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:53:12 -0000
> ok, i am lost. the draft is only an outline and has zero content? is > it a quiz? Treat it like that and see if you can give Joel the right answers. For me: Did it make any difference to you that it was a LIM rather than simply a SIDR interim? Were logistics and resources worth the fee? Should we hold future LIMs, or do the scheduling and other issues mean that normal interims are the way forward? cheers, Adrian
- Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observation… Adrian Farrel
- Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observation… Randy Bush
- RE: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observation… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [IETF] Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-… Warren Kumari
- Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observation… Randy Bush
- Re: [IETF] Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-… joel jaeggli
- Re: [IETF] Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-… Melinda Shore
- Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observation… Jari Arkko
- Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observation… joel jaeggli
- Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observation… Randy Bush
- Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observation… Jari Arkko
- Re: [IETF] I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-obse… Warren Kumari
- Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observation… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observation… Meetecho IETF support
- Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observation… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observation… joel jaeggli