Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observations-00.txt

Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org> Fri, 26 October 2012 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21C221F8641 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SGHirfqjHCSZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0FD21F8634 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.79] (99-108-174-213.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net [99.108.174.213]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LqQWn-1Sx6DI2Ioz-00dbB2; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:00:13 -0400
Message-ID: <508AB382.6050106@wonderhamster.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:00:02 -0500
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-jaeggli-interim-observations-00.txt
References: <042001cdab1d$df26b6b0$9d742410$@olddog.co.uk> <507D7A8C.1090201@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <507D7A8C.1090201@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:68wUOCCCkP2fMaCeo3Z0CqcaG2TWJ6mvPLj+RynuoSH wrG7DnSF5nylhIW+BVqIvT08z7UWKSmnW35pCpHSBhpBtYc9je MOf7ffFOqfNT5X8BbsiUa+6MJcrEpl5BFV+2+CdXlGGxRX7eWO biUkBSlvpgyJp1Ic+q7XWX1vZwuDDYdm31IJ3z1kJZkHb5ZaYA rzkaEM2PtaDHymW2s7nr/7fgQkDga6cTaZGa5IzQlA6GPEceIB hWaSdz17BDGeT8oLl197smfJXPTA9qumRxXP1DVt+GOS8FlwxX 3MGcl49ZhslSB8Xf+dDep46BjCrmmwjePdKOXmjbueEVTftPOI iFb6OE0h9OxqrIJWkQC0D1iHgpq6EOOp7xy1uC8nO
Cc: jjaeggli@zynga.com, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:00:25 -0000

Thank you, Joel, for putting pen to paper (pixels to glass?) on this, 
and thank you, Jari, Randy, and Warren for sharing your thoughts.

As was pointed out, we've had conversations about LIMs previously. It 
might be worth asking Ray to provide a paragraph or two on history and 
the motivations when some of the previous LIMs were discussed.

My memory of the proposed 2009 Malta LIM (supplemented by Teh Google) 
was that the working groups planning to meet weren't just from one area 
of interest (something like four RAI groups, plus SOFTWIRES and BEHAVE). 
I don't know if that helps or hurts - at a minimum, RIPE/foonog may not 
be the draw for RAI that it was for the groups that met this time.

FWIW, http://trac.tools.ietf.org/2009/jan-large-interim/ says 60 
potential attendees didn't qualify as a large interim :-)

Spencer