Re: The anti-harassment policy has gone missing on the Web site.

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Fri, 26 April 2019 14:29 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFE512004B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 07:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eYKvp2tH2nWU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 07:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-f176.google.com (mail-oi1-f176.google.com [209.85.167.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8307120046 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 07:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-f176.google.com with SMTP id n187so3074709oih.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 07:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3Da6ZDolvzKQS91ZNxborA5O47ShQ6BgDEs4D5nx7fs=; b=bqlt+ogOWrUJQW1iOYLYbIjy3BhFrKM13dBDEzWf9NYSZrMp/7+nuzfoUpe0EwpTZy N8Tgo45SCu2SMKb6KwEBZNBX5V2lVY1XGoUWXiOQ1I4VUA3KusvzqmwFUQYsf0w3NY4P uralSTIgHVW/45+Rrl7ERXJVP6Y+R+++rA5d/B8kwDlm6hLUrPHI6Q+XWpptbn+VtXaM yR67RW23fq50IKjW9K+MFPOf662wDtc4Cnh/TO84AA6m1kUvx/flWG3JHQlompK5lyBe omOcosRUc9PEM9ABfBqrZA9RJcLaUdN91sOftAshh0Ow6G93afVUTekD1rfJkFbQB7AQ iu2A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW5oQwtF4ld8/sjcv/XiiD3kamToY2UxE6+/vCcUsxCZzwf2gBv gz0ersT2+bnx7B/j/bCvdHga9GzIovSdsF4NztF4Vg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwkBK+ufbHn4bKYvOdolv5nO8JiJLVa9dw6jfQbnfDCg252sNXaqA9wa/YSg3VeAm1FlrSKwIFYw7du5ofswvU=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:b8c4:: with SMTP id i187mr7212527oif.6.1556288989675; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 07:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMm+Lwgd9qoMjpZmYbXPU+S3ixaGhRBM29L-N1kR0m6Ryg37kQ@mail.gmail.com> <9679365A-7D12-418C-A9C3-9FE0C24D9627@vigilsec.com> <CAMm+Lwi7mC9L3MvA6GfaAeUmymONYwDS7vP6LmsehUqANtivEQ@mail.gmail.com> <37EDC651-AD8E-4FFE-A61F-C5E60103DBAD@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <37EDC651-AD8E-4FFE-A61F-C5E60103DBAD@vigilsec.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:29:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwjJRebYRA0K=rG2apgSpBzfKah4uQWGz1BXLdBj13v4cw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: The anti-harassment policy has gone missing on the Web site.
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000065c89f05876fc404"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BVjbDW-kTXCkgU3O9IAUsOhl1hE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:29:53 -0000

Yes, I know how that happens, it is not fun getting this sort of thing
right. I am having similar difficulties with my own site.

I think the statement itself needs to be prominent in the 'about us'
section of the site. The point of such a statement is not what it says but
that it is made and that everyone sees it. From a purely functional point
of view, an anti harassment policy statement that starts 'Lorem ipsum'
transfers the same information.

Its like a software license, I don't actually have to read it to know what
it is going to say.


On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 4:55 PM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> I agree.  There is a plan to improve the parts of the web site that have
> IESG statements and implementation reports.  This task was just given to
> the Tools Team, and we are workin on the design.  This is an area where the
> Wagtail content management system has let us down, and we will probably
> release the changes back to the Wagtail code base.
>
> Russ
>
>
> On Apr 25, 2019, at 4:45 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
> wrote:
>
> My point is that this the people I want to read this are the people who
> would never think to search for it.
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 4:39 PM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>
>> https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf-anti-harassment-policy/
>>
>>
>> *From: *Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
>> *Subject: **The anti-harassment policy has gone missing on the Web site.*
>> *Date: *April 25, 2019 at 4:33:34 PM EDT
>> *To: *IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, IETF Chair <
>> chair@ietf.org>
>>
>> I just spent five minutes trying to find the anti-harassment / open
>> participation statement on the new Web site. Like many other things, I can
>> no longer find it.
>>
>> Point is that this is something participants need to see even if they are
>> not looking for it.
>>
>>
>>
>